I Relative Speed of Light Between Objects

Skaperen
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Given that motion in space is relative to the observer and that motion is limited to the speed of light, I am wondering how that relationship determines relative speed of objects that would seem to exceed the speed of light between them.
This is one of my thought experiments where I am drawing a big blank, If you have 2 objects approaching a 3rd object from opposite directions (just enough off to avoid collision) at 75% of the speed of light, the first assumption is that each observing the other would see the other object approaching at 150% of the speed of light. That can't be. What speed would each appear to be approaching as viewed by the other? I'm certain this must be less than 100% since true speed of anything is relative to the observer.

Just because an observer has accelerated to a speed that would pass the 3rd object at 0.75c does not mean their speed relation to any other object (doing the same at 180 degrees) can exceed 100% the speed of light. I would like to know what formulas apply to a case like this including at different speeds (0.8c and 0.9c) and different approach angles, (such as 120 degrees or 91 degrees).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a distinction between the separation rate that I measure between two objects that I see as in motion and the relative velocity either of those objects ascribes to the other. According to me the distance between two objects may increase at up to 2c, but each one will measure the other doing less than c. From my perspective this is because their rulers are length contracted and their clocks are time dilated and incorrectly synchronised, so I can understand their measures even if I don't agree. From their perspective it's my rulers and clocks that are acting oddly.

Motore has already linked to the relevant formulae.
 
  • Like
Likes Grasshopper, Vanadium 50 and jbriggs444
One should not confuse this issue. By definition the relative velocity between too (pointlike) objects is the velocity of one object in the rest frame of the other (at least the latter must have positive invariant mass of course). See Sect. 1.5 and 1.6 in

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top