I Relative Speed of Light Between Objects

Click For Summary
When two objects approach a third object at 75% of the speed of light, they cannot perceive each other as approaching at a combined speed exceeding the speed of light. Instead, the speed observed by each object is less than the speed of light due to the principles of relativity. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct velocity addition formulas to calculate relative speeds, especially at varying speeds and angles. Observers will measure distances and speeds differently due to effects like length contraction and time dilation. Ultimately, the relative velocity between two objects remains constrained by the laws of physics, ensuring no object exceeds the speed of light in any frame of reference.
Skaperen
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Given that motion in space is relative to the observer and that motion is limited to the speed of light, I am wondering how that relationship determines relative speed of objects that would seem to exceed the speed of light between them.
This is one of my thought experiments where I am drawing a big blank, If you have 2 objects approaching a 3rd object from opposite directions (just enough off to avoid collision) at 75% of the speed of light, the first assumption is that each observing the other would see the other object approaching at 150% of the speed of light. That can't be. What speed would each appear to be approaching as viewed by the other? I'm certain this must be less than 100% since true speed of anything is relative to the observer.

Just because an observer has accelerated to a speed that would pass the 3rd object at 0.75c does not mean their speed relation to any other object (doing the same at 180 degrees) can exceed 100% the speed of light. I would like to know what formulas apply to a case like this including at different speeds (0.8c and 0.9c) and different approach angles, (such as 120 degrees or 91 degrees).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a distinction between the separation rate that I measure between two objects that I see as in motion and the relative velocity either of those objects ascribes to the other. According to me the distance between two objects may increase at up to 2c, but each one will measure the other doing less than c. From my perspective this is because their rulers are length contracted and their clocks are time dilated and incorrectly synchronised, so I can understand their measures even if I don't agree. From their perspective it's my rulers and clocks that are acting oddly.

Motore has already linked to the relevant formulae.
 
  • Like
Likes Grasshopper, Vanadium 50 and jbriggs444
One should not confuse this issue. By definition the relative velocity between too (pointlike) objects is the velocity of one object in the rest frame of the other (at least the latter must have positive invariant mass of course). See Sect. 1.5 and 1.6 in

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/srt.pdf
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
649
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K