Relative Velocity Derivation from Maxwell-Boltzmann

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the relative velocity between two molecules A and B using the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The integral for the relative velocity, denoted as c_r, involves evaluating the joint probability distribution of the velocities of both molecules. The transformation to relative and center-of-mass velocity coordinates is established through specific relations, but the challenge lies in proving the equality of differentials dv_{Ai}dv_{Bi} = dv_{ri}dv_{ci}. The Jacobian determinant method confirms that the coordinate change does not affect the volume element.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Familiarity with differential calculus and Jacobian determinants
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics concepts such as relative and center-of-mass velocities
  • Proficiency in evaluating multiple integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in detail
  • Learn about Jacobian transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the implications of relative velocity in kinetic theory
  • Investigate applications of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, and students studying statistical mechanics or kinetic theory who are interested in molecular dynamics and velocity distributions.

feynman_freak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a specific question about the derivation of the relative velocity between two molecules A and B from the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution (which should equal square root of 2 times the average velocity).
In equations, I have been evaluating this integral:

\begin{eqnarray*}
c_r&=&\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}v_rP(v_{Ax},v_{Ay},v_{Az})dv_{Ax}dv_{Ay}dv_{Az}P(v_{Bx},v_{By},v_{Bz})dv_{Bx}dv_{By}dv_{Bz}\\
\ c_r&=&\bigg(\frac{m_A}{2\pi kT}\bigg)^{3/2}\bigg(\frac{m_B}{2\pi kT}\bigg)^{3/2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ldots\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}v_rdv_{Ax}...dv{_Bz}e^{-(m_A(v_{Ax}^2+v_{Ay}^2+v_{Az}^2)+m_B(v_{Bx}^2+v_{By}^2+v_{Bz}^2))/(2k_BT)}
\end{eqnarray*}

I have transformed to relative and center-of-mass velocity coordinates using these relations:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\ v_{ri}&=&v_{Ai}-v_{Bi}\\
\ v_{ci}&=&\frac{m_Av_{Ai}+m_Bv_{Bi}}{m_A+m_B}
\end{eqnarray*}

But now I cannot seem to prove that
\begin{equation*}
\ dv_{Ai}dv_{Bi} = dv_{ri}dv_{ci}\
\end{equation*}
(to transform the Cartesian differentials to center-of-mass differentials).

I have started like this ..
\begin{eqnarray*}
\ dv_{Ai}dv_{Bi}&=&\bigg(dv_{ci}+\frac{m_B}{m_A+m_B}dv_{ri}\bigg)\bigg(dv_{ci}-\frac{m_A}{m_A+m_B}dv_{ri}\bigg)\\
\ dv_{ri}dv_{ci}&\stackrel{?}{=}& dv_{ci}^2+\frac{m_B-m_A}{m_A+m_B}dv_{ri}dv_{ci}-\frac{m_Am_B}{(m_A+m_B)^2}dv_{ri}^2
\end{eqnarray*}

But do not end up with the final line actually being equal. If anyone has done this derivation before and has advice for converting the differentials I would be very, very grateful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When doing a change of coordinates with multiple variables, the way to find the general volume element dv_A dv_B in terms of the new variables is the Jacobian determinant; you can look at what I am referring to here. What you are really looking for is,

<br /> dv_{r}dv_{c}= \begin{vmatrix}\frac{\partial v_r}{\partial v_A} &amp; \frac{\partial v_r}{\partial v_B}\\ \frac{\partial v_c}{\partial v_A} &amp; \frac{\partial v_c}{\partial v_B}\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix} 1 &amp; -1 \\ \frac{m_A}{m_A +m_B} &amp; \frac{m_B}{m_A+m_B}\end{vmatrix} = 1<br />

so it looks like this coordinate change does not affect the volume element.
 
Excellent! Thank you so much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
601
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K