Relativistic charged particle in a constant uniform electric field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a charged particle at rest in a constant uniform electric field, specifically analyzing its velocity and position over time using special relativity. Participants explore the equations of motion, the relationship between proper time and coordinate time, and the implications for calculating radiated power using the Liénard–Wiechert formula.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equations of motion for a charged particle in an electric field, expressing concerns about the complexity of finding velocity in terms of coordinate time.
  • Another participant suggests using the concept of rapidity to transform the equations to the desired frame.
  • A third participant draws a parallel between the problem and the "relativistic rocket" scenario, providing a known solution for velocity in terms of time and referencing an external article for further context.
  • There is a reiteration of the solution for velocity in terms of time, emphasizing the need to derive the Lorentz factor from the proper time equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to solving the problem and the relevance of the "relativistic rocket" analogy, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the specific steps and transformations needed to relate proper time to coordinate time.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of integrating certain expressions and the potential for confusion in deriving the relationship between different time measures. There is also mention of the need to calculate radiated power, which introduces additional considerations not fully explored in the discussion.

notdroid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm doing some special relativity exercises. I have to find $$x(t), v(t)$$ of a charged particle left at rest in $t=0$ in an external constant uniform electric field $$\vec{E}=E_{0} \hat{i}$$, then with that velocity I should find the Liénard–Wiechert radiated power.

I will show you what I did but I feel that it is wrong.

We should solve the equation of motion given by

$$
\tag{1}\frac{dp^{\mu}}{d\tau} = \frac{q}{c} F^{\mu \nu}u_{\nu}
$$

The four-velocity is given by

$$
u^{\mu} = (u^{0},u^{1},u^{2},u^{3}) = \gamma (c,v^{1},v^{2},v^{3})
$$

where $v^{\alpha}$ are the components of the three-velocity. The four-momentum is

$$
p^{\mu} = mu^{\mu}
$$

This will give us four equtions where two of them will give a constant velocities and the other two are

$$
\tag{2}\frac{d\gamma}{d\tau} = -\frac{qE_{0}}{mc^{2}}\gamma v_{1}
$$

$$
\tag{3}\frac{d\gamma}{d\tau} v_{1} + \gamma \frac{dv_{1}}{d\tau} = \frac{qE_{0}}{m} \gamma
$$

Replacing (2) in (3) gives

$$
\tag{4}\frac{dv_{1}}{d\tau} = -\frac{qE_{0}}{mc^{2}} (v_{1})^{2} + \frac{qE_{0}}{m}
$$

The solution of the ODE (4) gives something like

$$
\tag{5}v_{1}(\tau) = A\tanh{(B\tau)}
$$

This component of the three-velocity is in terms of the proper time tau and the problem ask me to find the velocity in terms of the time t. So my attempt was to solve

$$
\tag{6}\frac{dt}{d\tau} = \gamma (\tau) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{(v_{1}(\tau))^{2}}{c^{2}}}}
$$

and then replacing this solution for tau in (5). But the solution of (6) is http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate 1/sqrt(1 - a^2*tanh(bx)^2). Which doesn't make any sense to me.

I think that I'm misunderstanding something or missing something that will give me a easier solution to this problem. I thought it because in the Liénard–Wiechert radiated power I sould do
$$dv_{1}/dt$$ which is almost impossible to do it without WolframAlpha.

Thanks for the read.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation (5) makes look like a rapidity; could you use that fact to transform to the frame you want?
 
Well, it seems to me that a charged particle in a uniform electric field should be equivalent to the well-known "relativistic rocket". See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/Rocket/rocket.html.

That article (the old sci.physics.FAQ article) gives $$v = c \, \tanh (a \tau/c)$$, which seems to match your answer - and my recollections.

If you want the solution for velocity in terms of time t and not ##\tau##, the article gives the less-well-known answer:

$$v = \frac{at}{\sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{at}{c} \right) ^2}}$$

which might be helpful. It remians to calculate the Lamour radiation, something I haven't done.

Also the FAQ article doesn't give the derivation of the relativistic rocket equation - you can find that in for instance MTW's "Gravitation", I think wiki has some, but since you seem to be getting the right answer, I'm not sure a reference is really needed.
 
pervect said:
Well, it seems to me that a charged particle in a uniform electric field should be equivalent to the well-known "relativistic rocket". See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/Rocket/rocket.html.

That article (the old sci.physics.FAQ article) gives $$v = c \, \tanh (a \tau/c)$$, which seems to match your answer - and my recollections.

If you want the solution for velocity in terms of time t and not ##\tau##, the article gives the less-well-known answer:

$$v = \frac{at}{\sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{at}{c} \right) ^2}}$$

which might be helpful. It remians to calculate the Lamour radiation, something I haven't done.

Also the FAQ article doesn't give the derivation of the relativistic rocket equation - you can find that in for instance MTW's "Gravitation", I think wiki has some, but since you seem to be getting the right answer, I'm not sure a reference is really needed.

Hello, thanks for that article. Yes, this is correct and the way to recover that velocity in terms of t is to use the equation (2) in the OP which gives you the functional form of $$\gamma (\tau)$$ and then solve $$dt/d\tau = \gamma (\tau)$$.

Thanks, now my problem is complete.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K