Relativistic Antiproton Protion

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
alex3
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
This isn't really so much of a homework problem, but I'm reading this webpage, and there's one part of the derivation of the required proton KE needed to produce a static antiproton.

The part that's puzzling me is

"and using... m2inc4 - p2inc2 = m20c4 "

I don't see where this formula is coming from. I can see the resemblance to the invariant, but the RHS deals with the moving proton, and the LHS only has the mass of a single proton, I'm confused as to why it's not (2m0)2c4.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alex3 said:
The part that's puzzling me is

"and using... m2inc4 - p2inc2 = m20c4 "

I don't see where this formula is coming from.
This is just a rearrangement of the usual Einstein formula:

[tex]E^2 = m_0^2c^4 + p^2c^2[/tex]

[tex]m^2c^4 = m_0^2c^4 + p^2c^2[/tex]

[tex]m^2c^4 - p^2c^2 = m_0^2c^4[/tex]

where m is the 'relativistic mass'.

(This formula is derived on the page just before the one you linked.)

I can see the resemblance to the invariant, but the RHS deals with the moving proton, and the LHS only has the mass of a single proton,
I'm not sure what you mean. This is the invariant. It's true for any proton, including the incoming one.
 
Aha of course, elementary really. Thanks very much for the clarification!