Relativistic Decay and Separation Between Moving Nuclei A and B

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex_ts
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the relativistic velocity addition formula to analyze the decay and separation of moving nuclei A and B. The calculations involve the transformation of time and distance using Lorentz transformations, specifically addressing the variables Dta and dab. Concerns are raised about the clarity of the mathematical presentation, suggesting the use of LaTeX for better readability. Additionally, there is a critique regarding the inconsistency in using the Lorentz factor γa while applying the relative speed uab in the transformation equations. The overall conclusion is that the solution presented may contain errors that need to be addressed for accuracy.
alex_ts
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
From the stationary position of the observed O, two nuclei of atoms A and B are launched simultaneously, which move (with respect to O) in the same direction with corresponding constant relativistic velocities ua=ac and ub=bc. c denotes the speed of light and for the constants a and b it is valid that 0<a<b<1. Observer O found that after time t, the two nuclei split simultaneously.

What is the time interval between the decays of the two nuclei with respect to nucleus A? What was the distance (relative to A) between nuclei A and B when A detected the fission of B?
Relevant Equations
uba=(ub-ua)/(1-uaub/c^2)

Dta=γa(tb-uba*xba/c^2) =>Dta=γa(t-uba*uba*t/c^2)=>Dta=γat(1-uba^2/c^2)

γ=1/(1-(u/c)^2)^1/2
The relative velocity of nucleus B with respect to nucleus A is given by the relativistic velocity addition formula:
uba=(ub-ua)/(1-uaub/c^2)

Dta=γa(tb-uba*xba/c^2) =>Dta=γa(t-uba*uba*t/c^2)=>Dta=γat(1-uba^2/c^2)
γa=1/(1-a^2)^(1/2)

and and we can replace uba with their respective expression.
And the distance at the moment of detection is: dab=uba*Dta and and we can replace uab and Dta with their respective expressions.

Is my solution correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is kind of hard to read. It would be easier to follow if you typeset the math using LaTeX.

Anyway, your solution doesn't look correct to me because you're using ##\gamma_a## in the Lorentz transformation but using ##u_{ba}## as the relative speed of the two frames.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and TSny
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top