Relativistic Decay and Separation Between Moving Nuclei A and B

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex_ts
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the relativistic velocity addition formula to analyze the decay and separation of moving nuclei A and B. The calculations involve the transformation of time and distance using Lorentz transformations, specifically addressing the variables Dta and dab. Concerns are raised about the clarity of the mathematical presentation, suggesting the use of LaTeX for better readability. Additionally, there is a critique regarding the inconsistency in using the Lorentz factor γa while applying the relative speed uab in the transformation equations. The overall conclusion is that the solution presented may contain errors that need to be addressed for accuracy.
alex_ts
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
From the stationary position of the observed O, two nuclei of atoms A and B are launched simultaneously, which move (with respect to O) in the same direction with corresponding constant relativistic velocities ua=ac and ub=bc. c denotes the speed of light and for the constants a and b it is valid that 0<a<b<1. Observer O found that after time t, the two nuclei split simultaneously.

What is the time interval between the decays of the two nuclei with respect to nucleus A? What was the distance (relative to A) between nuclei A and B when A detected the fission of B?
Relevant Equations
uba=(ub-ua)/(1-uaub/c^2)

Dta=γa(tb-uba*xba/c^2) =>Dta=γa(t-uba*uba*t/c^2)=>Dta=γat(1-uba^2/c^2)

γ=1/(1-(u/c)^2)^1/2
The relative velocity of nucleus B with respect to nucleus A is given by the relativistic velocity addition formula:
uba=(ub-ua)/(1-uaub/c^2)

Dta=γa(tb-uba*xba/c^2) =>Dta=γa(t-uba*uba*t/c^2)=>Dta=γat(1-uba^2/c^2)
γa=1/(1-a^2)^(1/2)

and and we can replace uba with their respective expression.
And the distance at the moment of detection is: dab=uba*Dta and and we can replace uab and Dta with their respective expressions.

Is my solution correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is kind of hard to read. It would be easier to follow if you typeset the math using LaTeX.

Anyway, your solution doesn't look correct to me because you're using ##\gamma_a## in the Lorentz transformation but using ##u_{ba}## as the relative speed of the two frames.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and TSny
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top