I Relativistic Doppler Effect near a Black Hole

AI Thread Summary
Viewing a person rotating near a black hole involves both gravitational redshift and relativistic Doppler effect redshift. If the person moves towards the observer, the Doppler effect causes a blueshift while the gravitational redshift remains. It is possible for the blueshift and gravitational redshift to equalize, allowing the observer to see the light at its original frequency. This cancellation can occur naturally for objects in circular orbits. The discussion emphasizes the interplay between these effects in extreme gravitational environments.
appot89
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Relativistic Doppler Effect near a blackhole
Hey everyone, if I were to view a shining person rotating near a black hole at near the speed of light there would be 2 kinds of redshifts: gravitational redshift and relativistic doppler effect redshift. Right?

But, say at some point, the person is traveling towards me, then the doppler effect would result in a blueshift while the gravitational redshift would remain. Is it possible that if the doppler effect blueshift and the gravitational redshift were equal, would I view the light shining at its original frequency?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
You can always adjust your speed relative to a nearby hovering observer so that your kinematic blueshift cancels the gravitational redshift, yes. It'll happen naturally at some point for an object in a circular orbit (and probably any other), if my algebra is correct.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top