Relativistic Electron/Positron collison.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculations involved in an electron-positron collision that produces a muon and an antimuon pair. The minimum electron energy required for this process is determined to be 106 MeV. The momentum of the electron is calculated as 106 MeV/c, and the Lorentz factor (γ) is found to be 208. The conversation also addresses the qualitative aspects of collision types, emphasizing that colliding beams with equal energies are more efficient for achieving high energies compared to fixed target accelerators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with particle physics terminology
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum relations
  • Ability to perform Lorentz transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy-momentum relation in special relativity
  • Learn about the velocity addition formula in relativistic contexts
  • Explore the differences between colliding beam and fixed target accelerator designs
  • Investigate Taylor series expansions in the context of relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and researchers interested in high-energy collisions and relativistic effects in particle interactions.

kirkbytheway
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In an electron positron collider, an electron and a positron are collided such that their momenta
in the lab are equal and opposite. In such a collision, the electron and the positron annihilate
and produce a muon and an antimuon. The rest mass of a muon is 106MeV/c^2.
(a) What is the minimum electron energy in the lab necessary to produce the muon
antimuon pair, in MeV?
(b) Assuming that the electron rest energy can be neglected, what is the momentum
of the electron, in MeV/c ?
(c) What is the gamma factor for the frame of reference in which the electron is at
rest? Here you will need to use the electron rest mass, which is 0.51MeV/c^2.
(d) By performing a Lorentz transform, or otherwise, work out the energy of the
positron in the rest frame of the electron, in MeV. Assume that the positron mass can be
neglected. What relevance does this result have to the choice of colliding beam accelerators,
where the beams are bought together with equal energies and opposite momenta in the lab,
compared to fixed target accelerators, where a beam of particles is collided with target particles
at rest in the lab?

Homework Equations



2nd Year Undergraduate Special Relativity and non-calculator approximations.


The Attempt at a Solution



For part a) I got 106 MeV by converting the rest mass into a rest energy and working out the energy required for the muon-antimuon pair production which must be equal to the energy of the electron-positron collison and since the electron and positron have the same momenta then the electrons total energy is half of the collison energy.

For part b) I got 106 MeV/c by using the approximation E=pc since the electrons rest energy (and rest mass?) is neglible.

For part c) I got γ=208 from using γ=sqrt(1+(p/mc)^2).

Its part d) that I've hit a wall with. Since γ=208 then the particle is moving at over 99% of c. When I try to calculate the velocity of the positron in the electrons rest frame I get another value that is over 99%c. Is there a more algebraic approach that can prevent me from having to deal with long calculator displays. I'm also struggling with the qualatative part of the questions, am I right in thinking that these type of collisions are an easier way of reaching high-energies than the other types?

Thank you in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kirkbytheway said:
Its part d) that I've hit a wall with. Since γ=208 then the particle is moving at over 99% of c. When I try to calculate the velocity of the positron in the electrons rest frame I get another value that is over 99%c. Is there a more algebraic approach that can prevent me from having to deal with long calculator displays.

Yes, Taylor series are very useful if you want to avoid too many 9's. For example, you can use the velocity addition formula,
w = \frac{2v}{1+v^2/c^2}, then set your v almost equal to c, v = (1-x) c where x is small, substitute to equation above and expand as a series of x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K