Relativistic Force Transformation: A Comprehensive Guide to Special Relativity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter N-Gin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Transformation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relativistic transformations of force components in special relativity, specifically focusing on the transformation of forces F_{x} and F_{y} under different reference frames. Participants explore the application of Newton's second law in relativistic contexts and the use of Lorentz transformations to derive these relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a method for deriving relativistic force transformations using Newton's second law and Lorentz transformations, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approach.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial approach but suggests that the transformation of force is not straightforward and introduces the concept of the Minkowski force as a four-vector.
  • A different participant challenges the initial reasoning, asserting that simply transforming coordinates is insufficient and emphasizes the need to understand the Minkowski force for accurate transformations.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in their earlier post regarding the transformation of time derivatives and expresses a desire to validate their thinking despite the complexity of the topic.
  • Another participant, while initially critical, later acknowledges the soundness of the first participant's approach, suggesting that it may be easier to analyze transformations from the proper frame of the particle experiencing the force.
  • References to specific textbooks and sections are provided as potential resources for further understanding of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the methods for transforming force in relativistic contexts. While some support the initial approach, others argue for the necessity of using the Minkowski force and caution against oversimplification. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion, including assumptions about the applicability of Lorentz transformations and the complexity of the Minkowski force. The participants express varying levels of familiarity with the concepts, which may affect their interpretations and conclusions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in the intricacies of special relativity, particularly those studying force transformations and the application of relativistic mechanics.

N-Gin
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find relativistic transformations of force which has two components [tex]F_{x}[/tex] and [tex]F_{y}[/tex] and velocities [tex]v_{x}[/tex] and [tex]v_{y}[/tex]. I'm not sure if I have right idea so I would be grateful if someone could check it out.

First of all, we have second Newton's law in special relativity (in this case for reference frame S)

[tex] F_{x}=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{x}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

[tex] F_{y}=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{y}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_{x}^2+v_{y}^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

When I derive everything, I get equations including velocities [tex]v_{x}[/tex], [tex]v_{y}[/tex] and accelerations [tex]a_{x}[/tex] and [tex]a_{y}[/tex].

Then I use second Newton's law in other reference frame, S' moving with velocity [tex]V[/tex] relative to frame S.

[tex] F_{x}'=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{x}'}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_{x}'^2+v_{y}'^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

[tex] F_{y}'=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{y}'}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_{x}'^2+v_{y}'^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

Then I use Lorentz transformations to find [tex]a_{x}\rightarrow a_{x}'[/tex], [tex]a_{y}\rightarrow a_{y}'[/tex] and [tex]v_{x}\rightarrow v_{x}'[/tex], [tex]v_{y}\rightarrow v_{y}'[/tex].

When I derive formulas for [tex]F_{x}'[/tex] and [tex]F_{y}'[/tex] and plug [tex]a_{x}'[/tex],[tex]a_{y}'[/tex], [tex]v_{x}'[/tex] and [tex]v_{y}'[/tex] I should get [tex]F_{x}\rightarrow F_{x}'[/tex] and [tex]F_{y}\rightarrow F_{y}'[/tex].

I'm not sure if this is the right way to do it because I don't have any literature concerning this. I would like to hear your opinion.

Sorry for eventually bad English and thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is right. You should end up with Fx = Fx' and Fy = gamma Fy'.
 
If you try your way you have to also transform d/dt.
That will lead to a mess.
The right answer is not as simple as your answer or Jason's.
F is not a four vector. To transform F use the 'Minkowski force', which is a four vector.
The Minkowski force is [tex]{\cal F}=[\gamma {\bf v\cdot F};\gamma{\bf F}][/tex].
The result is not simple unless F is in the rest system (v=0).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a (small) mistake in my first post.

[tex] F_{x}'=\frac{d}{dt'}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{x}'}{\sqrt{ 1-\frac{v_{x}'^2+v_{y}'^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

[tex] F_{y}'=\frac{d}{dt'}\left(\frac{m_{0}v_{y}'}{\sqrt{ 1-\frac{v_{x}'^2+v_{y}'^2}{c^2}}}\right)[/tex]

I'm not so familiar with Minkowski force. I know all of this is complicated but it really doesn't matter. I just want to know if my thinking is right.

I will try to solve this my way and see what it looks like. I really don't see anything wrong.
 
I tried to say it politely, but your thinking is completely wrong.
You can't transform the force by just transforming the coordinates.
You have to put the components of a 4-vector into the Lorentz transformation.
Don't even try until you are so familiar with the Minkowski force.
You need a textbook. What is your level?
 
clem said:
What is your level?

I'm a first year college. We are studying special relativity in general physics. Now, I know how to transform a force acting only in x or y direction. Also, reference frame S' is moving at constant velocity pointing towards positive direction of x (relative to S). Since everything we learned about special relativity are Lorentz transformations, mass and energy, I hoped that this would be enough to find force transformations. I guess I took this thing too serious...
 
N-Gin said:
I'm a first year college. We are studying special relativity in general physics. Now, I know how to transform a force acting only in x or y direction. Also, reference frame S' is moving at constant velocity pointing towards positive direction of x (relative to S). Since everything we learned about special relativity are Lorentz transformations, mass and energy, I hoped that this would be enough to find force transformations. I guess I took this thing too serious...

Your approach is sound, although there are more elegant ways of doing it via the transformation properties of the four force from the four momentum which you will come across later on.

Using your approach: Rather than trying to work out how force transforms between S and S' generally, it's easier to work out how it transforms from the proper frame of the particle experiencing the force, S' say, to any other frame S. You'll end up with Fx' = Fx, Fy' = gamma Fy.

If you get stuck, page 211-214 in Special Relativity by A.P French gives an identical working.

A Google book search on "force in relativistic mechanics" which will give a link to the above reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K