Relativistic mass and work problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work required to accelerate a body with a rest mass of 105 kg to a velocity where its clocks run at 1/10 the rate of lab clocks. The relevant equations include the Lorentz factor γ=1/√(1-(v/c)2) and the work-energy principle W = m0c2(γ-1). The rest energy of the body is calculated as Erest = m0c2 = 3x1013 J. The forum participants confirm that the work done on the body is equivalent to its kinetic energy since it starts from rest.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics concepts, particularly Lorentz transformations.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem in physics.
  • Knowledge of rest mass and relativistic mass calculations.
  • Basic understanding of kinetic energy equations in relativistic contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz factor γ in detail.
  • Explore the relationship between time dilation and relativistic speeds.
  • Investigate the work-energy theorem in the context of relativistic mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of relativistic mass on energy calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on relativistic mechanics, as well as anyone interested in the practical applications of work-energy principles in high-velocity scenarios.

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body has rest mass of 10^5 Kg. Find how much work must be done on the body to give it a velocity such that the clocks on the body run at 1/10 of the rate of the lab clocks. compare the work energy with the rest energy of the body

Homework Equations



γ=1/√(1-(v/c)2)

E= T -moc2

The Attempt at a Solution



t'/10 = t where t' is the lab time and t is the rest frame time

so γ=10 (my prof assured me that i need not find the velocity)

Erest = moc2 = 3x1013J


So the object starts at rest and is accelerated up to a speed such that the clocks run at one tenth the time in the lab frame

the formula which i found in my textbook was

W=∫(dE/dt)dt = Ef-Ei

but this formula was not in the notes so I'm not sure if it is appropriate, yet I do have time end points t' -> t/10

yet I've seen other forumlas in which work was said to be

W = moc2(γ-1)


Some clarification would be nice :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Liquidxlax said:
the formula which i found in my textbook was

W=∫(dE/dt)dt = Ef-Ei

but this formula was not in the notes so I'm not sure if it is appropriate, yet I do have time end points t' -> t/10
The formula is correct, but is not really useful because you don't have time end points. You only know how fast the clocks are ticking relative to each other. So the work could have been done over a very long time or a very short time, you don't know.
Liquidxlax said:
yet I've seen other forumlas in which work was said to be

W = moc2(γ-1)Some clarification would be nice :)
This is correct, because it is the equation for the kinetic energy of a particle, and the particle was initially stationary, so the KE is equal to the work done on the particle.

Edit: I don't know why I'm saying particle, it could be any object.
 
BruceW said:
The formula is correct, but is not really useful because you don't have time end points. You only know how fast the clocks are ticking relative to each other. So the work could have been done over a very long time or a very short time, you don't know.

This is correct, because it is the equation for the kinetic energy of a particle, and the particle was initially stationary, so the KE is equal to the work done on the particle.

Edit: I don't know why I'm saying particle, it could be any object.

heaviest particle in the universe :p

thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K