Relativistic or Classical? Calculation of De Broglie Wavelength

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the De Broglie wavelength for a 10 MeV proton and a 1 MeV electron, with participants exploring whether to apply relativistic or classical mechanics for these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the criteria for determining when to use relativistic versus classical methods, particularly focusing on the ratio of kinetic energy to rest mass energy. Questions arise regarding the validity of calculated energies and the appropriate equations to use for the De Broglie wavelength.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to calculating the De Broglie wavelength, with some participants suggesting to compare results from both relativistic and classical methods. Guidance is provided regarding the importance of unit consistency in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the use of natural units versus SI units, which may affect the clarity of the calculations being discussed.

EIRE2003
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Relativistic or Classical?? Calculation of De Broglie Wavelength

Hi there,

Okay, the question is: Calculate the De Broglie Wavelength of a 10 MeV proton and a 1 MeV electron.

How does one know whether to use relativistic or classical means?

Relativistic => Kinetic / Rest mass >/ = 10%

For proton: 10^7 eV / 938 x 10^6 eV = 0.0106

For electron 10^6 eV / 0.511 x 10^6 eV = 1.957

Are these relativistic energies? And if so, which equation would be required?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When that ratio of KE to rest energy is small, then a classical treatment is fine. That's not the case for the electron example. But if you're not sure, do it both ways and compare.

What's the relativistic relationship between energy, momentum, and rest energy for a particle?
 
My answer I keep on obtaining for the De Broglie wavelength seems to be ridiculous. 3.2x10^-46

I am using p = sqrt [(Kinetic energy)^2 + (2(rest mass)(kinetic energy))]

and lambda = h / p

rest mass of electron 0.511 MeV (0.511 x 10^6 eV)
 
EIRE2003 said:
I am using p = sqrt [(Kinetic energy)^2 + (2(rest mass)(kinetic energy))]
That doesn't look right to me.
 
Doc Al said:
That doesn't look right to me.


It looks just fine to me altough.

p = \sqrt{E_k^2+2E_km_0}

This is in natural units, i.e c = \hbar = 1 [/tex]<br /> <br /> So you must make sure you have the correct units everywhere, i.e you might want to convert all masses and energies into SI units (Joule, kg etc) before you start to calculate.
 
D'oh! That's why it looked funny--I rarely use natural units.

In SI-friendly form it will look like this:

p = \frac{\sqrt{E_k^2+2E_km_0c^2}}{c}

(I would find p in units of MeV/c and then convert to SI.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K