Relativistic velocity derivation under constant force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the relativistic velocity equation for an object accelerating under a constant force. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and concepts related to relativistic mechanics, including the implications of constant force on acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in deriving the relativistic velocity equation and questions the validity of their approach involving a sine function.
  • Another participant suggests that the force should be related to the momentum change, indicating the need to use the relativistic momentum equation.
  • A participant raises a question about whether a constant coordinate force results in constant proper acceleration as measured by an onboard accelerometer.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the terminology of coordinate versus proper values in the context of constant force.
  • One participant provides links to external resources that may assist in understanding the derivation of velocity from force, noting that the final answers align with established equations.
  • Another participant shares derived equations relating velocity to force and proper mass, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their derivation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the derivation. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, with some participants questioning the terminology and assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions, particularly regarding the distinction between coordinate and proper values in the context of relativistic acceleration.

cbriggs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been attempting to derive the relativistic velocity equation (for an object accelerating with a constant force- \frac{Fct}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}) for near a month without any solution.

I've derived an equation form the F=ma relation which includes a Sin function, so I know it's wrong. However, I haven't been able to determine why. Could someone point me in the right direction?

My derivation:

Using a=\frac{F}{m} and a\equiv\frac{dv}{dt}

\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{F}{m}

m dv= F dt where m\equiv\frac{m_{o}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}


\frac{m_{o} dv}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}= F dt

Integrate both sides

m_{o}c Sin^{-1}(\frac{v}{c})=Ft + constant

Which gives an answer that doesn't make sense and obviously doesn't represent v(t)

\frac{v}{c}=Sin(\frac{Ft + const}{m_{o}c})

Any idea where the error is, or how to get the correct expression? Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cbriggs said:
...My derivation:

Using a=\frac{F}{m} and a\equiv\frac{dv}{dt} here is the mistake

\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{F}{m}

m dv= F dt where m\equiv\frac{m_{o}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}


\frac{m_{o} dv}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}= F dt

...

You have to write

\vec{F}=\frac{d\,\vec{p}}{d\,t},\quad \vec{p}=m\,\gamma\,\vec{v}, \quad \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

Thus first integrate

\vec{F}=\frac{d\,\vec{p}}{d\,t}\Rightarrow \vec{p}}=\vec{F}\,t+\vec{p}_o

plug in \vec{p}=m\,\gamma\,\vec{v} and solve for the velocity.
 
Rainbow Child said:
\vec{F}=\frac{d\,\vec{p}}{d\,t}\Rightarrow \vec{p}}=\vec{F}\,t+\vec{p}_o

plug in \vec{p}=m\,\gamma\,\vec{v} and solve for the velocity.

I assume you are talking coordinate values here, not "proper values", meaning the constant force will produce decreasing coordinate acceleration with time.

Question: will such a constant (coordinate) force produce a constant proper acceleration, i.e., as measured by an accelerometer on board the spacecraft ?
 
Last edited:
I assume you are talking coordinate values here, not "proper values", meaning the coordinate acceleration will decrease with time.

I don't really understand the terminology here! It is not you by my English! :smile:

The constant force \vec{F} I mean is like the spacecraft is like a charge accelerating in a constant electrical field. Is that what you mean by constant coordinate force?
 
Wow... Thanks much, RC. I'm still not sure where my original math went wrong, but I'm okay with pondering that until I get the answer. My urgent task was to know how to derive the equation, which you have generously provided.

Jorrie- Yes: this applies to accelerating charges in a constant electric field (very good guess RC- you're on fire tonight), so no proper measurements required.

Regards to all,
Carey
 
Newton's 2nd law must be written in the form

\vec{F}=\frac{d\,\vec{p}}{d\,t}\Rightarrow \vec{F}=\gamma\,m\,\vec{a}+\gamma^3\,m\,\frac{\vec{v}\cdot\vec{a}}{c^2}\,\vec{v}

for the spatial compontets of the four-force.

But this is a horrible point to start! :smile:
 
This link gives the equations of a rocket with constant acceleration (as felt by the occupants of the rocket)

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html

It does not show the derivations but it gives you something to cross check your answers against.

This link gives a derivation of velocity from force. I’m not sure if the derivation is correct but the final answer agrees with the equations given by Baez.

http://www.usna.edu/Users/physics/mungan/Scholarship/ConstantAcceleration.pdf

The author makes the observation “The fact that the passengers feel one gee means that the force F measured in frame R is mg. However, as proved by French Eq. (7-20), an observer in frame E measures the same (longitudinal) force, despite the fact that she measures neither the same (relativistic) mass nor acceleration of the rocket. “ which simplifies things a bit.

Substituting F/m for a in the Baez equations(where m is the proper mass) and dividing by c we get:

\frac{v}{c}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+(m c)^2/(Ft)^2}}

and

\frac{v}{c}= tanh\left(\frac{F T}{m c}\right)

The last equation is in terms of the proper time and becomes:

\frac{v}{c}= tanh\left( sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{F t}{m c}\right)\right) in terms of coordinate time.

I hope that helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K