Relativity - energies of particles in circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energies of a proton, deuteron, and alpha particle in circular motion within an isotropic magnetic field, specifically addressing the implications of relativity on their energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the energies of different particles based on their mass and charge, questioning the correctness of their reasoning in both classical and relativistic contexts. Some participants seek clarification on the assumptions made regarding mass and energy relationships, while others explore the application of formulas for kinetic energy and centripetal force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing mathematical expressions to support their reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of how to reconcile classical approaches with relativistic considerations, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct interpretation or application of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the effects of relativity on the energy calculations, and participants are discussing the implications of mass increase and the corresponding energy requirements for maintaining circular motion at the same radius.

Ciumko
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Summary: What is energy of proton, deuteron and alpha particle in circular motion of the same radius.

Hello, I have a problem.

Here is the content of an exercise:

In some experiment, proton with energy of 1MeV is in circular motion in isotropic magnetic field. What energies would have deuteron and alpha particle to orbit in a circle of the exact same radius r?Wouldn't be much of a problem if it wouldn't be "relativity" problem. In classical example I would guess that for deuteron energy would be twice as big as for single proton (because of additional neutron), and for alpha particle it would be four times the energy of single proton. I am not 100% familliar with ale the relativity nuances, so I'd like to ask: Is my reasoning correct? Or there are additional effects taking place?

[Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't explain your reasoning. You just said it was a guess.
 
Yes and I would like to know the answer - just to know that my reasoning is right or wrong.

$$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}$$

so, as the radius have to remain the same:

$$F_{c}=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}$$

As the mass grows up to 2 or 4 the times of single proton you get energy two or four times the initial.But from the other side we know that ## F=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}=Bqv ##, taking velocity from that and applying in classical approach -> $$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{B^{2}q^{2}r^{2}}{m}$$ we have dependence of type ##E_{k}=E_{k}(\frac{q^{2}}{m})## so:

If for proton ##E_{k}=1MeV## then for deuteron (which is one proton and one neutron, so mass is twice as big as single proton) ##E_{k}=0.5MeV##, and for alpha particle (two protons and two neutrons) ##E_{k}=1MeV##

Which one is correct for classical approach and how to tackle it in relativity?
 
Last edited:
Ciumko said:
Yes and I would like to know the answer - just to know that my reasoning is right or wrong.

$$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}$$

so, as the radius have to remain the same:

$$F_{c}=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}$$

As the mass grows up to 2 or 4 the times of single proton you.But from the other side we know that ## F=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}=Bqv ##, taking velocity from that and applying in classical approach -> $$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{B^{2}q^{2}r^{2}}{m}$$ we have dependence of type ##E_{k}=E_{k}(\frac{q^{2}}{m})## so:

If for proton ##E_{k}=1MeV## then for deuteron (which is one proton and one neutron, so mass is twice as big as single proton) ##E_{k}=0.5MeV##, and for alpha particle (two protons and two neutrons) ##E_{k}=1MeV##

Which one is correct for classical approach and how to tackle it in relativity?

This all looks correct, except the notation at the end is confusing.

You need something like

##E_p = \frac{(qBr)^2}{2m} = 1MeV##

Then:

##E_d = \frac{(qBr)^2}{4m} = \frac12 E_p##

And,

##E_a = \frac{(2qBr)^2}{8m} = E_p##

Regarding relativity, the same formula applies for momentum:

##p = qBr##

But now ##p = \gamma mv## is the relativistic momentum and is related to the (total) energy of the particle ##\gamma mc^2## by:

##E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2c^4##

You could see what you can do with that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K