Relativity - time in different reference frames

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an astronaut traveling at a significant fraction of the speed of light and measuring her pulse rate, which is then compared to the rate measured by an observer on Earth. The context is rooted in the principles of relativity, specifically time dilation and reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of time dilation on pulse rate measurements and question the interpretation of proper time versus measured time in different reference frames. There are attempts to clarify the definitions of stationary and proper time in the context of relativity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on the concepts involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of proper time and how it relates to the astronaut's pulse, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the counterintuitive nature of the problem and the challenges posed by the relativistic framework, indicating that assumptions about motion and reference frames are being critically examined.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



An astronaut is traveling in a space vehicle moving at
0.500c relative to the Earth. The astronaut measures her
pulse rate at 75.0 beats per minute. Signals generated by
the astronaut’s pulse are radioed to the Earth when the
vehicle is moving in a direction perpendicular to the line
that connects the vehicle with an observer on the Earth.
(a) What pulse rate does the Earth-based observer measure?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


t_{astronaut}=\gamma t_{earth}

\gamma = 1.154701

Then \Delta t_{earth} = 51.962 s

\frac{75beats}{51.962s} = 1.443beats/s \frac{60s}{min} = 86.66 bpm

should be 64.9 bpm.

1_{}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2mqq04i.png
 
But they are saying beats PER minute not minutes per beat. It's totally counter intuitive the way that they are doing it. What a joke question.
 
The beats are like a clock, with a period 0.8 s. This is the proper time on the spaceship. An observer outside the ship notices, due to time dilation, that the period is longer. This translates into less beats per minute.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I thought the proper time was always the stationary one?
 
The idea of "stationary" doesn't work well with relativity. It could be easily argued that the ship is stationary and the Earth is moving with respect to it. Therefore, the definition of proper time is that the clock in question has not moved in a particular reference frame. For the astronaut, her "clock" is her pulse. Her pulse travels with her and is therefore "stationary" with respect to the ship. This is proper time. For the observers on Earth, her "clock" is moving. It was to the left in one instance and now it is moved to the right a little. This, is measured time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Gah this is so confusing. Everything was great until Einstein came along and ruined it.

Alas, my struggle continues. Thank you for the help Sir!
 
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K