Relativity: What's Relative & What's Not?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Whitefire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on distinguishing between relative and non-relative concepts in physics. Key examples of relative concepts include time flow, space, movement in space, and components of tensors, while non-relative concepts encompass the speed of light, the Planck constant, and invariant quantities like the number of particles. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding that relative concepts depend on coordinate systems, whereas non-relative concepts remain consistent across different frames of reference. The conversation aims to refine these lists for accuracy and generalization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with tensors and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of physical constants, such as the speed of light and Planck constant
  • Awareness of coordinate systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of length contraction in special relativity
  • Study the properties and applications of tensors in physics
  • Explore the Unruh effect and its significance in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of coordinate systems in defining physical quantities
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of relativity and the nature of physical quantities.

Whitefire
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
As all of you, I like to think about why and how Things happen; and as all of you I often feel frustrated by just how basic are the things we really don't know.

What would help me at least a bit is a meaningful list of things, values, concepts that are relative (in physics), and another comparable set of concepts that are not relative. For example:

Relative: time flow ("forward"?), space (distance, size), movement in space (?)

Not relative: speed of light, Planck constant, quantities (number of stars, particles...)

I would like the lists to be as accurate as possible, but the more general items on them, the better. I am really after some generalizations. Can you please help me add things to the lists? Can the things I wrote be questioned? Please do not get too specific, like listing different particles; and also please do not go outside of physics into things like emotions or psychological concepts (although they cen obviously be relative as well).

Thoughts, anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whitefire said:
As all of you, I like to think about why and how Things happen; and as all of you I often feel frustrated by just how basic are the things we really don't know.

What would help me at least a bit is a meaningful list of things, values, concepts that are relative (in physics), and another comparable set of concepts that are not relative. For example:

Relative: time flow ("forward"?), space (distance, size), movement in space (?)

Not relative: speed of light, Planck constant, quantities (number of stars, particles...)

I would like the lists to be as accurate as possible, but the more general items on them, the better. I am really after some generalizations. Can you please help me add things to the lists? Can the things I wrote be questioned? Please do not get too specific, like listing different particles; and also please do not go outside of physics into things like emotions or psychological concepts (although they cen obviously be relative as well).

Thoughts, anyone?
Relative: components of tensors, coordinates

Invariant: tensors, events

I am not certain, but that may be a complete list.
 
Whitefire said:
Relative: time flow ("forward"?), space (distance, size), movement in space (?)

Not relative: speed of light, Planck constant, quantities (number of stars, particles...)
To me, "relative" means coordinate dependent and "not relative" means coordinate independent. So I have to consider most of your examples wrong.

Time flow: Not sure what time "flow" is, but different coordinate systems can disagree about which event happened first.

Space: The distance between two objects is certainly relative. Think about length contraction in special relativity. Different coordinate systems also disagree about which slice of spacetime to call "space".

Movement in space: Velocities are assigned by coordinate systems, and different coordinate systems assign different velocities. The concept of "non-accelerating" is however coordinate independent.

Speed of light: OK in SR, as long as we stick to inertial coordinate systems.
The speed of light is the same in all inertial coordinate systems in SR, and at the origin of all local inertial coordinate systems in GR. But there are other coordinate systems.

Planck constant: OK

Number of stars: The number of stars in a region of space right now depends on what slice of spacetime we call space, and that's determined by the coordinate system. The number of stars in spacetime is however coordinate independent.

Number of particles: Check out the Unruh effect
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K