Removing a proton with a particle accelerator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of using a particle accelerator to remove a proton from an element, specifically examining the physical changes that would occur as a result. Participants explore the implications of such a process on the appearance of the element and the nature of matter, touching on concepts from chemistry and nuclear physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Hypothetical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what the observable physical change would be if a proton were removed from an element, pondering whether the element would visibly transform into another element.
  • One participant suggests that if all protons were removed from all atoms simultaneously, a sudden shift in appearance might be observed, although this scenario is noted as unrealistic.
  • Another participant mentions the process of inverse beta decay and its typical use in neutrino detection, raising questions about the feasibility of using it for transmutation in particle accelerators.
  • There is a discussion about the energy requirements for such a reaction, with calculations presented regarding the mass-energy equivalence and the potential for significant energy release, including references to gamma radiation and possible radioactive effects.
  • Some participants express curiosity about the hypothetical nature of the scenario, emphasizing that they are seeking to understand the underlying principles of matter rather than practical applications.
  • An analogy is drawn comparing the hypothetical transformation of potassium into argon to a magical transformation of an apple into an orange, questioning the perceptual aspects of such changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the scenario is hypothetical and not practical, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the observable changes or the feasibility of the proposed reactions. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the scenarios discussed, the dependence on various assumptions about nuclear reactions, and the unresolved complexities regarding the energy dynamics involved in the proposed transformations.

jgav9876
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
What would it look like if I used a particle accelerator to remove a proton from a particular element? What would the physical change in the element look like if observed? Would the element appear to "magically" change into something else right before your very eyes, as if by some kind of spooky magic? (For example, if element 19 were gold colored and element 18 were silver colored, would the instantaneous shift in color be visibly apparent upon direct observation of element 19 having a proton removed by a particle accelerator?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jgav9876 said:
What would it look like if I used a particle accelerator to remove a proton from a particular element? What would the physical change in the element look like if observed? Would the element appear to "magically" change into something else right before your very eyes, as if by some kind of spooky magic? (For example, if element 19 were gold colored and element 18 were silver colored, would the instantaneous shift in color be visibly apparent upon direct observation of element 19 having a proton removed by a particle accelerator?)
You realize that individual atoms are too small to see? I suppose that you are planning to trigger an inverse beta decay where Potassium-39 is transmuted to Argon-39 as a result of bombardment with an electron anti-neutrino.

My impression was that this reaction is normally used for neutrino detection, not for the creation of argon in particle accelerators.

Edit: A little more Googling reveals that the detector reaction is actually the other way around with an electron neutrino striking a liquid argon detector resulting in the creation of potassium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
 
jgav9876 said:
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
This is getting pretty unrealistic. If you are going to bombard a sample with enough anti-neutrinos to transmute a significant fleck of potassium, I would expect a radioactive mushroom cloud that hides the argon from view pretty effectively.

But I am not a nuclear physicist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
I wasn't saying it's practical - I should have clarified in my original post that I'm only asking this as a hypothetical situation in order to gain a better understanding of how matter works in general. So the fleck wouldn't stay a fleck? Hmm, interesting, okay. Thanks for your reply!
 
jgav9876 said:
I wasn't saying it's practical - I should have clarified in my original post that I'm only asking this as a hypothetical situation in order to gain a better understanding of how matter works in general. So the fleck wouldn't stay a fleck? Hmm, interesting, okay. Thanks for your reply!
Well, looking at the atomic mass for Potassium 39 compared to Argon 39, you are talking about an endothermic reaction requiring 0.0006 AMU per interaction. So if you have 39 grams (one mole) of Potassium 39, you'll need 0.0006 grams of mass equivalent as input energy.

You can Google it up. The potassium-39 is at 38.9637 AMU while argon-39 is 38.9643 AMU.

Let's use ##E=mc^2## to convert that to Joules -- ##6 \times 10^{-7} \text{kg} \times c^2## = 540 gigajoules. Only about 1/3 of a Hiroshima in input energy.

In fairness, 39 grams is rather more than "a fleck".

Edit: My energy budget may be off by a factor of two. The emitted positron counts for at least 0.00055 AMU. You are going to have a pretty good flux of 1.28 MeV gammas coming off as the positrons annihilate with electrons in the negative argon ions. So you may get that mushroom cloud after all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Wow. So the yield would be 39 grams of argon and an atomic explosion? Fascinating. Thank you.
 
jgav9876 said:
Wow. So the yield would be 39 grams of argon and an atomic explosion? Fascinating. Thank you.
Endothermic. So you have to provide an explosion's worth of energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Right! Yes, thank you. Sorry about that. The fascinating part to me is that the 39 grams of potassium would change into 39 grams of argon right before your very eyes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #10
jgav9876 said:
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
Here's a related question: if you magically turn an apple into an orange, does it look like an orange, or does it still look like an apple?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and topsquark
  • #11
PeroK said:
Here's a related question: if you magically turn an apple into an orange, does it look like an orange, or does it still look like an apple?
This is exactly the scenario I was imagining.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K