Removing a proton with a particle accelerator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of using a particle accelerator to remove a proton from Potassium-39, resulting in its transmutation to Argon-39. Participants clarified that this process involves an endothermic reaction requiring significant energy input, approximately 540 gigajoules, equivalent to about one-third of the energy released by the Hiroshima bomb. The conversation also touched on the observable physical changes during this transmutation, emphasizing that the transformation would not be instantaneous or visually apparent due to the scale of atomic interactions. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of nuclear physics and the energy requirements for such reactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear reactions, specifically inverse beta decay
  • Familiarity with atomic mass units (AMU) and energy calculations
  • Knowledge of particle accelerators and their applications in nuclear physics
  • Basic principles of endothermic and exothermic reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of inverse beta decay in nuclear physics
  • Study the energy requirements for nuclear transmutation processes
  • Explore the applications of particle accelerators in modern science
  • Investigate the implications of mass-energy equivalence as described by E=mc²
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, particle physics researchers, and anyone interested in the principles of atomic transmutation and energy dynamics in nuclear reactions.

jgav9876
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
What would it look like if I used a particle accelerator to remove a proton from a particular element? What would the physical change in the element look like if observed? Would the element appear to "magically" change into something else right before your very eyes, as if by some kind of spooky magic? (For example, if element 19 were gold colored and element 18 were silver colored, would the instantaneous shift in color be visibly apparent upon direct observation of element 19 having a proton removed by a particle accelerator?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jgav9876 said:
What would it look like if I used a particle accelerator to remove a proton from a particular element? What would the physical change in the element look like if observed? Would the element appear to "magically" change into something else right before your very eyes, as if by some kind of spooky magic? (For example, if element 19 were gold colored and element 18 were silver colored, would the instantaneous shift in color be visibly apparent upon direct observation of element 19 having a proton removed by a particle accelerator?)
You realize that individual atoms are too small to see? I suppose that you are planning to trigger an inverse beta decay where Potassium-39 is transmuted to Argon-39 as a result of bombardment with an electron anti-neutrino.

My impression was that this reaction is normally used for neutrino detection, not for the creation of argon in particle accelerators.

Edit: A little more Googling reveals that the detector reaction is actually the other way around with an electron neutrino striking a liquid argon detector resulting in the creation of potassium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
 
jgav9876 said:
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
This is getting pretty unrealistic. If you are going to bombard a sample with enough anti-neutrinos to transmute a significant fleck of potassium, I would expect a radioactive mushroom cloud that hides the argon from view pretty effectively.

But I am not a nuclear physicist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
I wasn't saying it's practical - I should have clarified in my original post that I'm only asking this as a hypothetical situation in order to gain a better understanding of how matter works in general. So the fleck wouldn't stay a fleck? Hmm, interesting, okay. Thanks for your reply!
 
jgav9876 said:
I wasn't saying it's practical - I should have clarified in my original post that I'm only asking this as a hypothetical situation in order to gain a better understanding of how matter works in general. So the fleck wouldn't stay a fleck? Hmm, interesting, okay. Thanks for your reply!
Well, looking at the atomic mass for Potassium 39 compared to Argon 39, you are talking about an endothermic reaction requiring 0.0006 AMU per interaction. So if you have 39 grams (one mole) of Potassium 39, you'll need 0.0006 grams of mass equivalent as input energy.

You can Google it up. The potassium-39 is at 38.9637 AMU while argon-39 is 38.9643 AMU.

Let's use ##E=mc^2## to convert that to Joules -- ##6 \times 10^{-7} \text{kg} \times c^2## = 540 gigajoules. Only about 1/3 of a Hiroshima in input energy.

In fairness, 39 grams is rather more than "a fleck".

Edit: My energy budget may be off by a factor of two. The emitted positron counts for at least 0.00055 AMU. You are going to have a pretty good flux of 1.28 MeV gammas coming off as the positrons annihilate with electrons in the negative argon ions. So you may get that mushroom cloud after all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Wow. So the yield would be 39 grams of argon and an atomic explosion? Fascinating. Thank you.
 
jgav9876 said:
Wow. So the yield would be 39 grams of argon and an atomic explosion? Fascinating. Thank you.
Endothermic. So you have to provide an explosion's worth of energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Right! Yes, thank you. Sorry about that. The fascinating part to me is that the 39 grams of potassium would change into 39 grams of argon right before your very eyes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #10
jgav9876 said:
It's been a while since I had chemistry. I forgot to mention that all of the atoms would have a proton removed, if such a thing were possible. If all of the protons were removed from all of the atoms simultaneously, would I observe a sudden shift in the physical appearance of the matter I'm observing as I described in my original post?
Here's a related question: if you magically turn an apple into an orange, does it look like an orange, or does it still look like an apple?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and topsquark
  • #11
PeroK said:
Here's a related question: if you magically turn an apple into an orange, does it look like an orange, or does it still look like an apple?
This is exactly the scenario I was imagining.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K