Repeated Eigenvalues: How to Solve for a General Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations with repeated eigenvalues, specifically the matrix x' = [-3 5/2; -5/2 2]x. The initial attempt to find the general solution leads to the eigenvalue r = 1/2, but further calculations reveal that the correct eigenvalue is r = -1/2. The user expresses frustration over reaching a dead end with only the trivial solution and seeks guidance on how to proceed with a second solution. Additionally, they encounter another problem involving a singular matrix P(t) that complicates the transformation needed for solving the system. The conversation highlights the challenges of working with singular matrices and repeated eigenvalues in differential equations.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
This problem, and all the others on this homework assignment, are making me angry.

Homework Statement



Find the general solution of the system of equations.

...

x'=[-3 5/2; -5/2 2]x

Homework Equations



Just watch me solve

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume there's a solution x= $ert, where I'm denoting a vector with constant entries $.

----> (A-rI)=$
----> (A-rI) is singular
----> det(A-rI)=0
---->(-3-r)(2-r)-(-5/2)(5/2)=0
----> r= 1/2
---->(A-(1/2)I)$=(0 0)T

But then I have a problem because the only solution is $=(0 0)T.

I'd know how to proceed, were it not for this dilemma. Next I would Assume there's a second solution x=$tert + #ert, where # is another vector with constant entries, and then solve.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution to (-3-r)*(2-r)-(-5/2)*(5/2)=0 is r=(-1/2), isn't it? Not r=1/2.
 
Dick said:
The solution to (-3-r)*(2-r)-(-5/2)*(5/2)=0 is r=(-1/2), isn't it? Not r=1/2.

r2 + 3r - 2r -6 + 25/4 = 0
r2 + r + 1/4 = 0
(r+1/2)2=0
r= -1/2

D'oh!

(More than likely, I will some more questions about this assignment. Keep checking into this thread.)
 
Alright, Dick. Here is that other question I promised you.

I have a problem in the form x'=P(t)x + g(t), and P(t) just happens to be a singular matrix with constant entries. Therefor I can't do a transformation to the form y'= Dy + h(t).

Grrrrr! Now what?
 
If P were diagonal, then you could split it into two separate equations. The usual way to do this is to find a basis of R^2 where P is diagonal, then express x and g in terms of that basis and solve. You aren't being very specific here.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K