Replacing bremsstrahlung tubes with solid-state alternatives?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

X-ray vacuum tubes cannot be replaced by solid-state alternatives due to the destructive impact of ionizing radiation on semiconductor crystal structures. The design of X-ray tubes requires a vacuum chamber that allows electrons to travel freely without collisions, which is unattainable in solid or gaseous states. The Coolidge Tube, a later model of X-ray tube, utilized a hot cathode to emit electrons, demonstrating the necessity of maintaining a vacuum for optimal electron flow and radiation generation. Understanding the physics behind bremsstrahlung radiation is crucial for comprehending the limitations of solid-state replacements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of X-ray tube physics
  • Knowledge of bremsstrahlung radiation
  • Familiarity with vacuum technology
  • Basic principles of electron acceleration and collision dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of bremsstrahlung radiation in detail
  • Study the design and operation of the Coolidge Tube
  • Explore advancements in vacuum technology for X-ray applications
  • Investigate the limitations of solid-state devices in high-radiation environments
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, engineers in medical imaging, and anyone involved in the design or maintenance of X-ray systems, particularly those interested in the challenges of replacing traditional vacuum tubes with solid-state technologies.

Rev. Cheeseman
Messages
360
Reaction score
21
TL;DR
Can we replaced X-ray or any radiation generating tubes with solid-states?
What are the reasons X-ray vacuum tubes could not be replaced by solid state alternatives?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
wonderingchicken said:
What are the reasons X-ray vacuum tubes could not be replaced by solid state alternatives?
Ionising radiation destroys the crystal structure of semiconductors.
 
Baluncore said:
Ionising radiation destroys the crystal structure of semiconductors.

So I guess it is common sense to include some kind of chamber so the electrons can move freely instead of flowing through solids? Is that one of the reason?
 
wonderingchicken said:
So I guess it is common sense to include some kind of chamber so the electrons can move freely instead of flowing through solids? Is that one of the reason?
Do you understand how an X-Ray tube works ?
 
davenn said:
Do you understand how an X-Ray tube works ?

Is my reasoning which is "So I guess it is common sense to include some kind of chamber so the electrons can move freely instead of flowing through solids?" correct?

Not sure if this is true but I believe it works by changing electrons into bremsstrahlung radiations by putting some sort of converters inside.
 
@wonderingchicken It is time to do some reading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_tube#Physics
Electrons from the cathode, accelerated by an electric field, will impact the anode with an energy in eV equal to the accelerating voltage. As the electron is decelerated by the heavy metal nuclei in the target, the kinetic energy is released as photons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung

Look at the Planck–Einstein relationship between the energy and the wavelength of the photon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck–Einstein_relation

The electrons need a clear run without intermediate collisions in order to deliver maximum energy to the target. The electron acceleration voltage must be insulated and not short circuited. That is simply not possible in a solid or a gas.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Vanadium 50 and Rev. Cheeseman
Baluncore said:
@wonderingchicken It is time to do some reading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_tube#Physics
Electrons from the cathode, accelerated by an electric field, will impact the anode with an energy in eV equal to the accelerating voltage. As the electron is decelerated by the heavy metal nuclei in the target, the kinetic energy is released as photons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung

Look at the Planck–Einstein relationship between the energy and the wavelength of the photon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck–Einstein_relation

The electrons need a clear run without intermediate collisions in order to deliver maximum energy to the target. The electron acceleration voltage must be insulated and not short circuited. That is simply not possible in a solid or a gas.

So what I said earlier "So I guess it is common sense to include some kind of chamber so the electrons can move freely instead of flowing through solids? Is that one of the reason?" is basically what you said "The electrons need a clear run without intermediate collisions in order to deliver maximum energy to the target. The electron acceleration voltage must be insulated and not short circuited. That is simply not possible in a solid or a gas".

Thank you very much. I'll read these links you've shared. Much appreciated.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: davenn
wonderingchicken said:
So what I said earlier "So I guess it is common sense to include some kind of chamber so the electrons can move freely instead of flowing through solids? Is that one of the reason?" is basically what you said "The electrons need a clear run without intermediate collisions in order to deliver maximum energy to the target. The electron acceleration voltage must be insulated and not short circuited. That is simply not possible in a solid or a gas".

Thank you very much. I'll read these links you've shared. Much appreciated.
As a matter of interest, the early X-ray tubes contained a little air, which had the effect of increasing the beam current. From the Wiki page on X-ray tubes: "Crookes tubes generated the electrons needed to create X-rays by ionization of the residual air in the tube, instead of a heated filament, so they were partially but not completely evacuated".
 
tech99 said:
As a matter of interest, the early X-ray tubes contained a little air, which had the effect of increasing the beam current. From the Wiki page on X-ray tubes: "Crookes tubes generated the electrons needed to create X-rays by ionization of the residual air in the tube, instead of a heated filament, so they were partially but not completely evacuated".

If I'm not mistaken, it is impossible to get perfect vacuum so even for the hardest vacuum possible for vacuum tubes there are actually still gas molecules in them although the pressure is already very low. Correct?
 
  • #10
wonderingchicken said:
If I'm not mistaken, it is impossible to get perfect vacuum so even for the hardest vacuum possible for vacuum tubes there are actually still gas molecules in them although the pressure is already very low. Correct?
What does it matter how many molecules are left? If the majority of accelerated electrons reach the anode without collision with a gas molecule, then the electrons that reach the anode will generate radiation as if it was a perfect vacuum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rev. Cheeseman
  • #11
Baluncore said:
What does it matter how many molecules are left? If the majority of accelerated electrons reach the anode without collision with a gas molecule, then the electrons that reach the anode will generate radiation as if it was a perfect vacuum.
With the early tubes the gas enabled more electrons to flow due to the ionisation resulting from collisions with gas molecules. The tubes had an arrangement to add more air as time went on as the vacuum tended to increase with time. The later hard vacuum X-ray tube was the Coolidge Tube, which had a hot cathode to emit electrons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rev. Cheeseman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
654
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K