Reported someone I suspected of cheating during an exam.

  • Thread starter Thread starter General_Sax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cheating Exam
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ethical implications of reporting a suspected cheating incident during an introductory physics exam. Participants explore the motivations behind reporting, the nature of cheating, and the impact of such actions on both the individual and the academic community.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes witnessing a classmate behaving suspiciously during an exam, leading to a report to the TA, and questions whether this action was justified.
  • Another participant argues that reporting may stem from selfish motives rather than genuine concern for fairness, suggesting that individuals should trust established systems to handle cheating.
  • Some participants assert that cheaters will eventually face consequences, advocating for a focus on one's own performance rather than on others' actions.
  • There is a discussion about the ambiguity of the term "life saver," with multiple participants expressing confusion about its meaning in the context of the incident.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of individual competence in testing and the need for accountability for those who cheat.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential negative impact on the reporting individual's exam performance due to distraction from the incident.
  • Some participants reflect on the moral implications of reporting, suggesting that it may not align with altruistic values and could lead to personal conflict.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the appropriateness of reporting suspected cheating, with no clear consensus. Some support the act of reporting as a moral obligation, while others argue against it, suggesting that it may be more beneficial to focus on personal integrity and trust the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the lack of definitive proof regarding the classmate's actions and the subjective nature of interpreting the situation. There are also concerns about the impact of the reporting action on the exam environment and the potential for personal repercussions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students navigating academic integrity issues, educators considering policies on cheating, and individuals exploring the ethical dimensions of reporting misconduct in educational settings.

  • #61
General_Sax said:
^

Maybe I don't understand grade curving.

If the course is 'curved', then how could cheating not affect my grade?


Ok you want to be vindicated.
"Well done General Sax, you did the right thing calling attention to a potential infraction to exam rules and regulations, exposing an alleged cheater and thus possibly saving everyone's grades."

There, feel better?

Can we drop the subject now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Pattonias said:
Exactly, if you are cheating your way through your exams you are purposely impairing your ability to make sound decisions when you become an engineer in the real world.

I agree, correct me if I am wrong though, don't you think that with that the chances that someone fresh out of school is going to design a work ready bridge without any review is very realistic? My decision of take a bridge or a long away around depends on it. I would expect a pretty rigorous method to insure safety by real engineers. I doubt a cheater could fool someone unless he was intelligent in the first place. Then again a person that smart wouldn't cheat, they would see that there is no long term solution to it and just go at it the standard way, and actually learn it.

I am swaying towards academic institutions laziness to evolve. I personally never saw cheating as advantageous for that reason, Like Duct taping a leaky facet...You have to fix it eventually. Where is the innovation in school though? People will cheat regardless, it's like drugs. You throw information at someone, and you hope if they can answer a couple of questions with an acceptable level of correctness that they are competent. People want things, they have needs. Some people are willing to take risks.

Why not test people in different ways. They have the resources, they can conduct tests, Isn't this the next step in advancing society? Seems like everyone is more concerned with short term issues, where we go in circles.

I guess that is another subject though.
 
  • #63
Virtuous said:
I
Why not test people in different ways. They have the resources, they can conduct tests, Isn't this the next step in advancing society? Seems like everyone is more concerned with short term issues, where we go in circles.


What are those different ways?
 

Similar threads

How Do Players Cheat in Chess?
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
What should I do about my academic supervisor?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Admissions Should I submit 860 PGRE?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
912
Testing Should I Use Old Exams? The Pros & Cons of Cheating
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Courses Report Professor Misconduct: Seeking Justice for Unfair Grading
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Other Advice for Pursuing Physics: My Friend's Story
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Coding Bootcamps - Can Anyone be a Six-Figure Coder?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Navigating the Dilemma of Cheating on a Calculus Exam
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Courses Is skipping a semester a terrible idea in academia?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Cheating & Paranoia in Community College Exams
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K