Representing sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the formula relating the sum of delta functions to the sum of exponentials in the context of Fourier Transform. The periodic nature of the delta functions and the constructive interference of the exponential waves at specific points are highlighted as key insights. The conversation emphasizes that both sides of the equation are not traditional functions but should be viewed as generalized functions, which require integration with test functions for proper interpretation. Test functions are described as smooth functions with compact support or rapidly decreasing functions, which help define the behavior of generalized functions. Overall, the discussion underscores the need for further study of generalized functions and their applications in mathematical modeling.
RobikShrestha
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I saw this formula while studying Fourier Transform:

[Sum of δ(t-lT) from l=-infinity to l= +infinity] = 1/T * [Sum Of exp(jlΩt) from l=-infinity to l=+infinity].

I am having trouble getting this into my head. How do I prove it or understand the physical meaning of this formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physical meaning depends on how you are modeling the physical world with mathematical objects.

Eyeballing it, I think there's a clear geometric idea here, though. The sum of delta functions is periodic, concentrated at one point per period. The sum of exponentials sets up a sequence of waves aligned with that period that constructively interfere at those points and destructively interfere at the remaining points.I feel it important to point out that neither side makes sense as a function -- this equation could only possibly make sense when viewed as a statement about generalized functions.How to prove it? The most direct way would be by the typical definition of generalized functions: multiply by a generic test function and integrate. If both sides give the same value for all test functions, they are equal as generalized functions.
 
Generalized functions? Generic test function? What are they?

It seems I have a lot of studying to do. They are not taught in our college course.

If you have simple explanations then please explain them to me.
 
The short answer is that generalized function is something you can integrate with, and their meaning is entirely determined by integration.

For example, if F(x) and G(x) are generalized functions, then we can make sense of their sum F(x) + G(x) as a generalized function: it is defined to be the generalized function such that

\int (F(x) + G(x)) \varphi(x) \, dx = <br /> \int f(x) \varphi(x) \, dx +<br /> \int G(x) \varphi(x) \, dx

for all test functions \varphi.

(aside, you should be wary about asking questions like "what is the value of this generalized function at 3?", which has a lot of subtle semantic difficulties)

What is a test function? There are lots of choices for what to call a test function, and each different choice gives a different class of generalized functions.


Two typical definitions are are
  • A test function is a smooth function with compact support (i.e it is zero outside of a bounded set)
  • Rapidly decreasing functions: smooth functions that vanish 'rapidly' as x \mapsto \pm \infty.
It would probably be fair to equate "test function" with "well-behaved function".


There are other schemes for generalizing the notion of function. The ones I describe here are called distributions.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K