Reproduction in poor and unhealthy environments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reproduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the intersection of nanotechnology and global clean water distribution, highlighting the alarming statistics regarding parasites and microbes in drinking water in densely populated areas. The conversation emphasizes the moral implications of population growth in impoverished regions, where individuals continue to reproduce despite dire health conditions. The consensus is that the application of nanotechnology should focus on providing affordable clean water, enabling communities to transition away from reliance on biological evolution for survival.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nanotechnology applications in environmental science
  • Knowledge of global health issues related to water quality
  • Familiarity with the concepts of evolution and population dynamics
  • Basic awareness of the nitrogen cycle and its relevance to ecosystems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in nanotechnology for water purification
  • Explore the impact of parasites and microbes on public health
  • Investigate strategies for effective community education on food safety
  • Study the economic implications of affordable clean water solutions in developing regions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for environmental scientists, public health officials, policymakers, and anyone interested in the application of technology to solve global water distribution challenges.

Mickey
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
I am thinking about going back to school to study how nanotechnology can help solve our problems of global clean water distribution.

I am absolutely horrified by the statistics on parasites, microbes, and inorganic junk that swims in the drinking water of certain highly populated areas. Then I stop and think, hey, wait a minute. Why are they so highly populated? Shouldn't they be dying from all these diseases?

The fact of the matter is that they do die and do so in large numbers, since there are so many to begin with. Yet, somehow they still experience large population growth. These people just go on and keep having babies around these cesspools despite the conditions their offspring will be born into, and despite the fact they will have another mouth to feed, and despite the fact the mother doesn't stand a very high chance of survival on birth either.

I think, sheejus, this is immoral! Don't they realize that it gets harder and harder to help them the larger their population grows? Can't they at least keep their pants on?! Until they find clean water?

Then it hits me. This is evolution at work. When a species faces a problem, it will still reproduce at all costs, spread the genes around, and try to out-evolve the natural forces of competition. Whether they know it or not, people in impoverished and unhealthy conditions reproduce with the hope that their offspring will be more adapted to fight those conditions than they were.

It's a really disgusting thought. I am not religious, but I do have a strong sense of morality, and I come from a culture that has believed itself to have risen above the dependence on neck-breaking speeds of reproduction in order to survive. Instead it relies on social means of resource exchange on micro and macro scales where everybody takes part, which in turn relies on self-control and the ability to abstain from destructive behavior.

The real value to be obtained from the application of nanotechnology to clean water distribution in the developing world will not be to simply make clean water available, but to make it available at a low cost so those people can join our new world that doesn't rely first on biological evolution for survival.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
What region are you talking about? If you cook your food you kill parasite eggs in them. Most people get sick and get parasites because they eat raw food. I also don't think man can evolve to avoid parasites. Parasites work differenlty than bacteria. Bacteria have recpetors on them that bind to different things in your body. Chemicals usually attack bacteria or deal with their active sites where they bind. Parasites cling to your inside. How can you evolve/prevent that? Lubricate your intestines and pray for the best?
I am in no way trying to steer you away from what you are doing. It is awesome that you should decide to do this, but wouldn't you think that it would be easier to warn people to cook their food properly and thoroughly.
 
Last edited:
Mickey said:
The real value to be obtained from the application of nanotechnology to clean water distribution in the developing world will not be to simply make clean water available, but to make it available at a low cost so those people can join our new world that doesn't rely first on biological evolution for survival.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_cycle

i don't think i want to replace that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
81K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K