Republican lies used to trick the public

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around perceived misinformation and claims made by Republicans, focusing on various political narratives and their implications. Participants explore topics such as media bias, fiscal conservatism, the justification for the Iraq War, oil pricing, and government preparedness for terrorism. The conversation includes a mix of opinions, critiques, and counterarguments, reflecting on the political landscape and public perception.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the media is perceived as liberal primarily because Republicans provide more material for criticism, while others contend that media ownership influences its political stance.
  • There is a claim that Republicans are not true fiscal conservatives, with questions raised about government spending and accountability.
  • Participants discuss the narrative that the U.S. is fighting terrorism in Iraq, with some asserting that this is misleading and others suggesting that the presence of terrorists in Iraq is a consequence of the invasion.
  • The assertion that oil prices are determined solely by supply and demand is challenged, with some participants suggesting that profit motives and price gouging play significant roles.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of government preparations for future terrorist attacks, with differing opinions on whether sufficient actions have been taken.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the claim that Republicans have acted responsibly in ensuring national security, linking it to broader criticisms of government performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the accuracy of the claims made in the original post. Disagreements persist regarding the characterization of media bias, the effectiveness of government actions, and the implications of the Iraq War.

Contextual Notes

Some statements are presented as opinions rather than established facts, and there are indications of differing interpretations of events and policies. The discussion reflects a complex interplay of political beliefs and interpretations of evidence.

  • #151
I finally fully apreciate what Sir Winston Churchill meant when he said:

Democracy is the worst form of Government barring all the rest:biggrin:

You voted the semi literate ninkompoop in again you kinda screwed up there:bugeye: the world breathes a collective sight that presisdents only have two terms of office. How lucky you are that that constitutional idea was finally enforced:smile:

American Politics, honestly guys you couldn't make this stuff up:-p

Our politics are down right mundane compared to you guys, hats off?

Your media representation of the world is also fairly amusing, it often walks a fine line between impartial reporting and propaganda. it's a good job you Americans have other ways of obtaining information than your news programmes. They sometimes distort the facts a little too much for my liking. Mind you so does much of our press sometimes, you just have to chose the wheat from the chaff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 110 ·
4
Replies
110
Views
29K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 242 ·
9
Replies
242
Views
22K
  • · Replies 238 ·
8
Replies
238
Views
29K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1K ·
34
Replies
1K
Views
97K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K