Required Level of Physics/Engineering Knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Delta Force
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knowledge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the level of physics and engineering knowledge required to participate in the Physics Forums, particularly for individuals trained in energy policy. Participants explore the implications of having varying degrees of formal education in physics or engineering for engaging with the community.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that no formal physics or engineering knowledge is necessary to read or post questions, as long as the questions are based on actual science.
  • Others argue that having a degree in a relevant field, such as electrical engineering, could be beneficial for understanding energy policy.
  • A few participants emphasize the importance of understanding the scientific method and distinguishing between peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources, rather than specific scientific knowledge.
  • There are claims that many energy and environment degrees include significant physics training, which raises questions about the necessity of physics knowledge for discussing energy topics.
  • Some participants express that while specific scientific knowledge may not be required, a basic understanding of physics concepts could enhance one's ability to comment on energy issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the required level of physics or engineering knowledge for forum participation. Multiple competing views exist regarding the necessity and relevance of such knowledge in the context of energy policy discussions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying interpretations of what constitutes adequate knowledge for participation, as well as differing opinions on the relevance of formal education in physics or engineering to the field of energy policy.

Delta Force
Messages
81
Reaction score
7
I'm trained in energy policy, not physics or engineering. How much physics and engineering knowledge do you need to know on this site?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
Engineering news on Phys.org
Zero, give or take.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Electron Spin and Nidum
Delta Force said:
I'm trained in energy policy, not physics or engineering. How much physics and engineering knowledge do you need to know on this site?
None, as long as you don't post personal theories. As long as you're asking questions based on actual science, you'll be fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
Delta Force said:
I'm trained in energy policy, not physics or engineering. How much physics and engineering knowledge do you need to know on this site?

Need to know for what goal? There are members on this site with no formal physics training at all, while others have a PhD in it.
 
As far as I know, you may need a degree in a topic such as electrical engineering. A sub-discipline like power systems might help quite a bit in understanding "energy policy".
 
Delta Force said:
I'm trained in energy policy, not physics or engineering. How much physics and engineering knowledge do you need to know on this site?
You need no knowledge to read the posts. But please think twice before you post, how educated are you on what you are posting? What value will your post add to the discussion? Even if you have a question, you should have links to the source of where your question came from. You might want to spend a bit of time reading threads first to see how posting is done. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
phion said:
As far as I know, you may need a degree in a topic such as electrical engineering. A sub-discipline like power systems might help quite a bit in understanding "energy policy".
Yes, it would very likely be QUITE helpful for his profession, but that wasn't the question. He asked what he needs to know to join the forum and that does not require what you specify.
 
phinds said:
Yes, it would very likely be QUITE helpful for his profession, but that wasn't the question. He asked what he needs to know to join the forum and that does not require what you specify.

In any meaningful sense, a professional would likely discern the difference quite quickly. I am merely inserting this advice as a student of electrical engineering.
 
phion said:
As far as I know, you may need a degree in a topic such as electrical engineering. A sub-discipline like power systems might help quite a bit in understanding "energy policy".

Energy policy is actually its own field. It focuses more on the economic, environmental, regulatory, national security, etc. factors of energy than the science and engineering though.
 
  • #10
Delta Force said:
Energy policy is actually its own field. It focuses more on the economic, environmental, regulatory, national security, etc. factors of energy than the science and engineering though.
Post if you feel you have a good knowledge of the subject being discussed. Always back up what you post with the sources for that information so that we can all see what you are referencing.

As long as you ask, if you are not sure, or don't push something if it's been pointed out to be wrong, you'll be fine. Don't worry. Don't be afraid to say that you don't know and just want a clarification.

Just stay within the guidelines, they are pretty lax. :smile:
 
  • #11
How can you be any kind of commentator on energy without having SOME physics training ? Most of the energy and environment degrees have a solid amount of physics from modules that contain topics like thermodynamics, heat and mass transfer, optics mechanics etc
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Specific knowledge of a science is not needed. Just a clear understanding of what the scientific method and the difference between peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed sources.

“The wind kills all your birds. All your birds, killed. You know, the environmentalists never talk about that.” - PEOTUS. You don't happen to work for this man do you? He could use some real science in his energy policy.
 
  • #13
newjerseyrunner said:
Specific knowledge of a science is not needed. Just a clear understanding of what the scientific method and the difference between peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed sources.

“The wind kills all your birds. All your birds, killed. You know, the environmentalists never talk about that.” - PEOTUS. You don't happen to work for this man do you? He could use some real science in his energy policy.
Bipolar Demon said:
How can you be any kind of commentator on energy without having SOME physics training ? Most of the energy and environment degrees have a solid amount of physics from modules that contain topics like thermodynamics, heat and mass transfer, optics mechanics etc

sorry, don't mean to be rude, I know zero physics. :sorry: I think OP knows more physics than he realizes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K