Requirements and Characteristics of a Good System Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kinn Sein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A good system design must meet or exceed specified performance parameters, remain within budget, and adhere to timelines. Key parameters include maintenance downtime, operating costs, and useful lifetime. The principle of K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple, Stupid) is essential, emphasizing minimalism to reduce complexity and potential failure points. Incorporating multitasking components, such as combining motors and cams, enhances efficiency and reliability in design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of system performance parameters
  • Familiarity with K.I.S.S. design principles
  • Knowledge of multitasking components in engineering
  • Basic concepts of thermal management in systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research best practices for system performance optimization
  • Explore advanced K.I.S.S. design techniques in engineering
  • Learn about integrating multitasking components in mechanical design
  • Investigate thermal management solutions for system efficiency
USEFUL FOR

System designers, mechanical engineers, project managers, and anyone involved in optimizing system performance and reliability.

Kinn Sein
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What requirements do we have to consider before designing a system? What are the characteristics of a good system design?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A good system meets or exceeds the specified performance parameters, on or under budget and in proper time. Parameters include, maintenance downtime and expense, operating costs, useful lifetime, etc..
 
First rule, K.I.S.S.
 
"A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exup'ery
 
That's a really nice quote, suolintu. Minimalism is always best; the less stuff you put in, the less there is to screw up. That's why I'm such a fan of 'multitasking' components. Whenever possible, I try to design multiple functions into each part. For instance, if one function needs a motor and cam, and another function needs another motor and cam, I'll put the two cams on the same motor (maybe with intermediate gearing for speed differentials). It's less likely that a couple of gears will pack it up than a whole motor assembly will. There's also the weight-saving, as well as the elimination of a bunch of electrical harnessing.
As another 'for instance', if you have to pump water from point 'A' to point 'B' in a system than might get hot, it makes more sense to incorporate a cooling jacket and radiator into the water path than to add a whole external system for temperature control.
This, obviously, is not always practical, but it's a good rule-of-thumb.
 
! Yes. Very good points.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K