I Residual of an algebraic equation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equations f(x,y)=0 and g(x,y)=0, Newton iteration is employed, allowing for the definition of a residual at each iteration. The term 'residual of x' or 'residual of y' refers to the individual components of the overall residual from the iteration process. This suggests that the residual should be analyzed separately for each variable rather than as a collective measure of the equations. Understanding these residuals is crucial for assessing convergence in the iterative process. Clarifying these terms enhances the comprehension of the Newton iteration method in solving algebraic equations.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
To solve a set of equations f(x,y)=0, g(x,y)=0, where x, y, f, g are scalars, use Newton iteration. At each iteration step i, can certainly define the residual of this set of equations. But what's meant by the term 'residual of x' or 'residual of y'? Not the 'residual of the equations'?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My guess would be take the residual of the iteration and look at the components separately.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top