Residue of ArcTan: Is the Residue Theorem Applicable?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pere Callahan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Residue
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of the Residue Theorem to the arctan function at z=±i and the natural logarithm at z=0. Participants conclude that the Residue Theorem cannot be applied to these functions due to their non-holomorphic nature in any neighborhood around their singularities. Specifically, the arctan function and the logarithm require careful consideration of their domains, as the logarithm necessitates a branch cut that disrupts holomorphicity around z=0. Thus, the Residue Theorem is inapplicable in these cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex Analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of holomorphic functions
  • Knowledge of the Residue Theorem
  • Familiarity with Laurent series and branch cuts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Residue Theorem in the context of holomorphic functions
  • Explore the properties of the arctan function in complex analysis
  • Review the definition and implications of branch cuts for logarithmic functions
  • Examine examples of Laurent series and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in the properties of holomorphic functions and the application of the Residue Theorem.

Pere Callahan
Messages
582
Reaction score
1
Hi Folks,

Does it make sense to speak of the residue of the arctan function at [tex]z=\pm i[/tex]?

Or the residue of the natural logarithm at z=0 ..?

The problem probably is that these functions are not holomorphic in however a small disk around the singularity...

So am I right in assuming that the Residue Theorem cannot be applied to such functions?

Maybe I should read up on this in my old Complex Analysis textbooks...:rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about arctan off the top of my head, but about log, it doesn't. The reason being that Laurent series requires you to have an annulus around the point in which the function is holomorphic. To define log, you have to take a cut plane, so any annulus around 0 has the cut running through it, and hence log isn't holomorphic at that point
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K