Resistance in a Medium Between 2 Spheres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The resistance R between two small conducting spheres with radii a and b embedded in a medium of resistivity ρ and permittivity ε is calculated using the formula R = (ρ/4π)[(1/a) + (1/b) - (2/d)]. The current I is derived from the equation I = ∫JdS, where J is the current density. The potential difference ΔV between the spheres is found using the superposition principle, leading to the expression ΔV = kQ(1/a + 1/b - 2/d). The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the non-symmetrical electric field due to the presence of both spheres.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law and its application in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with Ohm's law and current density concepts
  • Knowledge of superposition principle in electric fields
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in non-symmetrical charge distributions
  • Learn about electric field calculations for multiple charged objects
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as potential theory
  • Investigate the effects of medium properties on resistance and capacitance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and materials science who are working on problems related to electrostatics and resistance in conductive media.

mindarson
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two small conducting spheres with radii a and b are imbedded in a medium of resistivity ρ and permittivity ε with their centers separated by a distance d >> a, b. What is the resistance R between
them?

Homework Equations



R = V/I

I = ∫JdS = (1/ρ)∫EdS



The Attempt at a Solution



I assume a charge +Q on the sphere of radius a and a charge of -Q on the sphere of radius b. (As you'll see, my answer for the resistance doesn't depend on the charge, which physically makes sense: why would the resistance of the medium depend on the charges of the spheres?)

The resistance is given by ΔV/I, where ΔV is the potential difference between the spheres and I is the current. I calculate the current using the equation

I = ∫JdS

where the integrand is a dot product. I can solve this using Gauss's law/Ohm's law:

I = ∫JdS = σ∫EdS = Q/(ρε0)

I'm not entirely sure of the move I just made. To be clear, I draw a gaussian surface around EITHER sphere, and compute the current via Gauss's law. Is this correct? It seems to me I can only have one current here, and that's the only way I can think to get it. But something does seem fishy, at the very least because one of the spheres is negatively charged and one is positively charged, so I'd get opposite currents by using Gauss's law on each sphere in turn.

Now I find the potential difference between the spheres. Using superposition, the potential on the surface of the sphere of radius a is

Va = (kQ/a) - [kQ/(d-a)]

where d-a is just the distance between the center of the sphere of radius b and the surface of the sphere of radius a. Similarly the potential on the surface of the sphere of radius b is

Vb = (-kQ/b) + [kQ/(d-b)]

Now I assume that a and b are both negligible compared with d (as implied in the problem statement). Thus d-a = d-b ≈ d. Then difference between the 2 potentials is

ΔV = Va - Vb = kQ(1/a + 1/b - 2/d)

Now I can calculate the resistance. After some algebra, I get

R = ΔV/I = (ρ/4∏)[(1/a) + (1/b) - (2/d)]

Is this looking pretty good?

I'm still very unsure about my current calculation...

Thanks for any help you can offer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mindarson said:
I = ∫JdS = σ∫EdS = Q/(ρε0)
You have to be careful here. You assume a constant EdS. For a spherical surface around one of the spheres with a distance <<d, this is a reasonable approximation, but you should make it clear that this is not exact. With one sphere, it would be, but with two spheres the field is not symmetric any more. Superposition will not help, as the charge distribution on the surface can depend on the other sphere.

R = ΔV/I = (ρ/4∏)[(1/a) + (1/b) - (2/d)]

Is this looking pretty good?
Looks good, and you can neglect 2/d here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K