Calculating Resistive Force on Styrofoam Dropping from 2.00m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the resistive force acting on a piece of styrofoam dropped from a height of 2.00m. The acceleration is described by the equation a = g - bv, where g is the acceleration due to gravity and b is the resistive constant. The styrofoam reaches terminal velocity after falling 0.500m and takes 5.00s to reach the ground. The terminal velocity (Vt) can be expressed as Vt = mg/b, and the velocity function is derived from the integration of the motion equation, resulting in v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of terminal velocity
  • Basic knowledge of calculus for integration
  • Experience with resistive forces in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the resistive constant b using the provided time and distance data
  • Explore the derivation of the velocity function v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)) through integration
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass on terminal velocity in different materials
  • Study the impact of air resistance on falling objects of different shapes and sizes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of falling objects and resistive forces in fluid mechanics.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
I come back once more with a question:
So far, when it comes to resistive forces, I've only done resistance for slow moving objects in liquids and small particles through the air, along with larger objects going against heavier air resistance. This question refers to a smaller particle:

A small piece of styrofoam packing material is dropped from a height of 2.00m. Until it reaches terminal velocity (velocity when the net force is 0N), the acceleration is given as a = g - bv. After falling .500m, the styrofoam reaches terminal speed and takes 5.00s to reach the ground. I need to find the value of the constant b.

Thus far, resistance R = -bv and that mg (weight) is pulling the styrofoam down. That would imply ma = mg - bv, in which a = g - (b/m)v. Terminal velocity is when Vt = mg/b and is only approached, not reached, so the equation for v would be
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)). The question said that a = g - bv...so I would assume m = 1kg (a bit big for styrofoam)...or do I have to come up with another equation for this? and how would I incorporate displacement into the equations if the acceleration is not constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
I come back once more with a question:
So far, when it comes to resistive forces, I've only done resistance for slow moving objects in liquids and small particles through the air, along with larger objects going against heavier air resistance. This question refers to a smaller particle:

A small piece of styrofoam packing material is dropped from a height of 2.00m. Until it reaches terminal velocity (velocity when the net force is 0N), the acceleration is given as a = g - bv. After falling .500m, the styrofoam reaches terminal speed and takes 5.00s to reach the ground. I need to find the value of the constant b.

Thus far, resistance R = -bv and that mg (weight) is pulling the styrofoam down. That would imply ma = mg - bv, in which a = g - (b/m)v. Terminal velocity is when Vt = mg/b and is only approached, not reached, so the equation for v would be
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)). The question said that a = g - bv...so I would assume m = 1kg (a bit big for styrofoam)...or do I have to come up with another equation for this? and how would I incorporate displacement into the equations if the acceleration is not constant?
You are making the problem complex. It is given that a = g-bv. Terminal velocity can be calculated knowing that it takes 5 seconds to travel 1.5m. What is the acceleration at terminal velocity? Solve for b.
 
I see...I get what you're saying; with the time, I can find b knowing the at some point v is approximately Vt. I have just one more question. How did they find that
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)).
 
Last edited:
I told you the other day -- by integration of the eqn of motion. You'll soon learn it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K