Resolving forces, should be simple

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two cylinders resting on a smooth slope, with one cylinder in contact with a vertical wall. Participants are tasked with determining the forces acting on the cylinders, specifically focusing on the interactions between the cylinders, the slope, and the wall, expressed in terms of weight and angle of inclination.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the resolution of forces acting on the lower cylinder, including the normal forces from the slope and the wall. There is a focus on the components of these forces and how they relate to the overall problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on drawing diagrams and considering the components of forces in different directions. There is a recognition of the need to resolve forces both parallel to the slope and horizontally, though not all participants agree on the approach. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify misunderstandings and explore different methods of analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration over the use of moments, indicating a preference for resolving the problem using known concepts without introducing new methods. There is also mention of specific forces that may have been overlooked in the calculations.

furor celtica
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two cylinders of equal radii each have weight W. They are at rest on a smooth slope of inclination A° to the horizontal, the lower of the two cylinders being in contact with a smooth vertical wall as shown in the diagram. Find, giving your answer in terms of W and A°, the magnitude of the force exerted by
a. the slope on the upper cylinder
b. the lower cylinder on the upper cylinder
c. the upper cylinder on the lower cylinder
d. the wall on the lower cylinder
e. the slope on the lower cylinder

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



OK so the first three are pretty obvious, a.= WcosA°, b.=c.=WsinA°
However I’m having trouble with d.

So d.=(normal contact force exerted on lower cylinder by slope resolved for the horizontal)+(normal contact force exerted on lower cylinder by upper cylinder resolved for the horizontal) = ((WcosA° resolved for the horizontal) + (WsinA° resolved for the horizontal)) = WcosA°sinA° + WsinA°cosA°=2WsinA°cosA°
However, the correct answer is 2WtanA°; where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Untitledf.png
    Untitledf.png
    2 KB · Views: 555
Physics news on Phys.org
hi furor celtica! :smile:
furor celtica said:
… (normal contact force exerted on lower cylinder by slope resolved for the horizontal) … = (WcosA° resolved for the horizontal)

no :redface:

(and you may find it easier to use moments :wink:)
 
dude could you be more helpful then 'no+sad smiley'?
i don't know what a moment is and I'm pretty sure I'm supposed to solve this problem using (surprise surprise) things i already know.
cheers
 
hey seriously i don't know what a moment is, that really wasn't helpful, i need to solve this without using moments
 
ok, draw a diagram of all the forces on the lower sphere (there are 4, and they all go through the centre of the sphere)

then, to find the reaction from the wall (d), add the components of all the forces in the direction parallel to the slope

what do you get? :smile:

(for e, choose a different direction)
 
are you sure i should resolve for the direction parallel to the slope and not horizontally?
 
try both, and see what you get :wink:
 
ok i figured out totally independently that i was forgetting the force exerted on the lower cylinder by the wall when calculating the normal reaction exerted by the slope on this cylinder, but if you can take some advice you were really not helpful here dude. seriously, you got me all messed up.
 
furor celtica said:
ok i figured out totally independently that i was forgetting the force exerted on the lower cylinder by the wall when calculating the normal reaction exerted by the slope on this cylinder, but if you can take some advice you were really not helpful here dude. seriously, you got me all messed up.

uhh?? :confused:

you specifically asked …
furor celtica said:
… where did I go wrong?

and i told you!

after that, you failed to show any work, even after i reminded you there were 4 forces involved :redface:

anyway, do you now see why you needed to resolve parallel to the slope? :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K