Quantum Resources for learning Quantum Field Theory

AI Thread Summary
Studying quantum field theory (QFT) without prior knowledge of regular quantum mechanics is challenging but not impossible. A solid understanding of physics and mathematics is essential for grasping QFT concepts. David Tong's lecture notes on QFT are recommended as a starting point, particularly the "Preliminaries" section, which outlines necessary prerequisites. Although the quantum mechanics section may seem daunting, it primarily involves operator equations, which can be manageable for those with a background in classical mechanics. Engaging with these resources can provide a pathway to understanding QFT.
aclaret
Messages
24
Reaction score
9
hello :)

i would very much like study some quantum field theorie, but have not previously study any regular quantum mechanic (i am not so interest in regular quantum mechanic, but more the relativistic theories).

so i ask, this is possible or not? to what extent knowledge of regular quantum mechanic is prerequisite for the quantum field theorie? any book is good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aclaret said:
hello :)

i would very much like study some quantum field theorie, but have not previously study any regular quantum mechanic (i am not so interest in regular quantum mechanic, but more the relativistic theories).

so i ask, this is possible or not? to what extent knowledge of regular quantum mechanic is prerequisite for the quantum field theorie? any book is good?
I would say you have no chance to learn QFT unless you know a lot of physics and maths. You could, however, take a look at David Tong's notes here. The first pdf is "Preliminaries" and what you need to know.

https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft.html

See whether you can make any sense of that.
 
yes, everything look familiar apart from quantum mechanic section. i complete rigorous class semester before on the classic mechanic from the book of Spivak 'mechanic for mathematician'.

although what he write about the quantum mechanic not seem so difficult, it just look like operator equation to me :)

ok then, these notes i will begin to read. thank!
 
aclaret said:
yes, everything look familiar apart from quantum mechanic section. i complete rigorous class semester before on the classic mechanic from the book of Spivak 'mechanic for mathematician'.

although what he write about the quantum mechanic not seem so difficult, it just look like operator equation to me :)

ok then, these notes i will begin to read. thank!
Good luck!
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
668
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top