I Ricci tensor from this action

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    action Tensor
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Here is an action for a theory which couples gravity to a field in this way:$$S = \int d^4 x \ \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} (R + g^{ab} \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b})$$I determine\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} &= \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} (R + g^{ab} \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}) \\
\nabla_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\nabla_a \Phi)} &= 2\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} g^{ab} (\Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b} + \Phi_{;ba})
\end{align*}giving ##R = g^{ab} (\Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b} + 2\Phi_{;ba})##. Now vary the action with respect to the metric,\begin{align*}
\frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{ab}} &= -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} g_{ab} (R + g^{cd} \Phi_{;c} \Phi_{;d}) + \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi}(\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{ab}} + \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}) \end{align*}Put ##\delta R_{ab} / \delta g^{ab} = R_{ab}## and insert the previous equation for ##R##. Zero the variation and cancel the common factor ##\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi}##,$$0 = -g_{ab} g^{cd} (\Phi_{;c} \Phi_{;d} + \Phi_{;dc}) + R_{ab} + \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}$$This should give ##R_{ab} = \Phi_{;ba}## but it doesn't work out that way because the indices are mangled. Can somebody see the error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Here is an action for a theory
Is there a particular source from which you got this? It looks like it might be the general action for one kind of scalar-tensor theory of gravity.
 
It's just a very old exam. I presumed it was just something arbitrary the examiner thought up, but may have some application.
 
Not sure if you eventually managed to figure it out but your error is you're overloading indices when taking the variations. Generally speaking, it's better to give separate indices for the field you're taking variations with respect to, compared to the indices in the quantity you're computing variations of.

We have $$\frac{\delta S}{\delta \nabla_c \Phi} = 2\sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\nabla^c \Phi,$$ hence $$\nabla_c\frac{\delta S}{\delta \nabla_c \Phi} = 2\sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\nabla^c \nabla_c \Phi.$$ Thus $$R = 2\nabla^a \nabla_a \Phi - \nabla^a \Phi \nabla_a \Phi.$$

We can now compute ##\frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{ab}}##. The general expression you calculated is indeed correct: $$R_{cd} = \frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{cd}} = \sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\left(\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{cd}} - \frac{1}{2}g_{cd}R + \nabla_c \Phi \nabla_d \Phi - \frac{1}{2}g_{cd}\nabla^e \Phi \nabla_e \Phi\right).$$

We have $$\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{cd}} = 2\nabla_c \nabla_d \Phi - \nabla_c \Phi \nabla_d \Phi.$$ Plugging in for ##R## we find the desired result $$R_{ab} = \nabla_a \nabla_b \Phi.$$

Hope that helps!
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Yeah, it was a mistake in ##\nabla_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\nabla_a \Phi)}##. Hard for me to figure out why it happened. :)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top