MiNdHaBiTs
- 2
- 0
what wind has more force the wind of you standing on top of a car doing 200mph or you standing still and a 200mph wind hitting you?
The discussion revolves around the comparison of forces experienced by a person in two scenarios: standing on top of a car moving at 200 mph versus standing still while being hit by a 200 mph wind. Participants explore the sensations and forces involved in these situations, including personal experiences with high-speed winds while riding motorcycles.
Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the forces experienced in the two scenarios, and the discussion remains unresolved with differing opinions on the relevance of various factors.
Participants express uncertainty about the impact of protective gear and body position on the perceived wind force, and there is a lack of clarity regarding the assumptions made about the scenarios presented.
10 charsgendou2 said:... or holding on for dear life in a storm ... with 80% of your body behind a windscreen.
I wear a full face helmet, (also ear plugs to reduce wind noise), when I ride a motorcycle. Considering head height is almost as high as a SUV, speeds on a motorcycle appear to be lower than in a car. 100mph or faster wouldn't be too fun if your face was exposed.gendou2 said:No, I was talking about only the feeling on your face.
Well, the point is that the air in the envelope of a moving motorcycle, even where your face is, is possibly significantly less than 100mph relative to you.gendou2 said:Huh? Windscreen? No, I was talking about only the feeling on your face. The rest of the body, windscreen or no, is irrelevant. In any cast, problem solved, so let's lock it up.![]()
DaveC426913 said:Well, the point is that the air in the envelope of a moving motorcycle, even where your face is, is possibly significantly less than 100mph relative to you.
A 100mph wind OTOH, would be truly 100mph.
I don't think it is negligible, and I do think it's the question being addressed, as per post #3, in which the OP explains the circumstances under which the question has been raised.gendou2 said:True, but this is negligible and I don't think it's the question being addressed.