- #61
WhoWee
- 219
- 0
Tregg Smith said:
post hangover dementia
Right to Ridicule: Investigating Its Impact on Constitutional Rights
- Thread starter SW VandeCarr
- Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of free speech, particularly regarding the right to ridicule and its implications for various groups, including public figures and individuals with disabilities. Participants debate whether free speech includes the right to ridicule, especially in cases where it may infringe upon the rights of others, such as the freedom to worship or protection from discrimination. The conversation touches on the legality of hate speech, including calls for genocide, which are often tolerated under U.S. law unless deemed credible threats. The nuances of ridicule versus bigotry are explored, with some arguing that ridicule can lead to societal harm and violence, particularly against marginalized groups. The potential for ridicule to undermine constitutional rights is acknowledged, and the need for societal norms to guide acceptable speech is emphasized. Ultimately, the dialogue reflects a struggle to balance the right to free expression with the responsibility to protect individuals from harm and discrimination.
post hangover dementia
- #62
mXSCNT
- 310
- 1
the words of Noam Chomsky: "Goebbels was in favour of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favour of freedom of speech for precisely for views you despise. Otherwise, you're not in favour of free speech."
- #63
WhoWee
- 219
- 0
mXSCNT said:
I don't think anyone in the US is concerned with being shot over something they say - unless they do it on the wrong city street (perhaps).
