Rigorous definitions in general relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rigorous definitions and concepts in general relativity, including the nature of topological spaces, coordinate systems, world lines, and generalized physical spaces. Participants explore the implications of these definitions within the framework of general relativity, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the universe is a topological space with events as elements, each having neighborhoods homeomorphic to R^4.
  • There is a contention regarding the definition of a local coordinate system, with one participant asserting it should involve smoothly compatible coordinate charts and a smooth atlas.
  • Participants discuss the definition of a world line, with some suggesting it should be a regular curve defined on an interval in R, while others note the requirement for continuity and differentiability.
  • One participant suggests that a generalized physical space consists of world lines of material bodies that never meet, while another questions the global applicability of this definition.
  • There is a proposal that a physical space could be defined as a family of time-like world lines that appear continuously immobile for a unique observer.
  • Participants discuss the method of defining a time variable in a generalized physical space through specific parametrizations along world lines, referencing Poincaré-Einstein dating as an example.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of concepts in general relativity, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on the definitions presented, particularly regarding generalized physical spaces and their properties.

Contextual Notes

Some definitions may depend on specific interpretations of terms such as "generalized physical space" and "world line," and there are unresolved questions about the global versus local applicability of certain concepts.

Nana Dutchou
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello

(a) The universe U is a topological space whose elements are called events and as each event has a neighborhood homeomorphic to R^4.

(b) A local coordinate system is a homeomorphism between an open subset of U and a bounded subset of R.

(c) A world line segment is a continuous function which is defined on an open subset of R and takes values in U.

(d) A generalized physical space (a set of spatial positions) is a particular family of world lines of material bodies. For example, in general relativity, a generalized physical space of Rindler consists of world lines of a family of Rindler observers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#The_Rindler_observers

(e) To define a time variable in a generalized physical space we just have to choose a particular parametrization along each of his world lines or (in a corpuscular model) we just have to choose a particular parametrization along the world line of the body whose movement is studied. For example, a Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P is a temporal variable (t) and a Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P' is another temporal variable (t'). A Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P is a temporal variable obtained by this method : the date associated with an event A is the arithmetic mean of the dates of issuance and receipt by P of a light signal which is reflected in A.

These definitions are correct in general relativity ?

Thank you.
Rommel Nana Dutchou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where you got your definition of (b) from. In the context of GR, a coordinate chart is a pair [itex](U,\varphi )[/itex] such that [itex]U[/itex] is open, [itex]\varphi :U \rightarrow U'[/itex] is a homeomorphism where [itex]U'\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}[/itex] is open, and [itex]\forall (V,\psi )[/itex] another coordinate chart such that [itex]V\cap U\neq \varnothing[/itex] implies [itex]\psi \circ \varphi ^{-1}:\varphi (U\cap V)\rightarrow \psi (U\cap V)[/itex] is a diffeomorphism (such charts are said to be smoothly compatible). The maximal collection of all smoothly compatible coordinate charts on a manifold is called the smooth atlas (I say in the context of GR because outside of GR we can just talk about topological manifolds with no smooth atlas / smooth structure). Point (a) is incomplete if you are talking about space - times in GR. A space - time is a topological manifold (using Wald's convention this means it is a Hausdorff, second countable, locally euclidean topological space) that has a smooth atlas and has subsequently been endowed with a metric tensor that is a solution to the EFEs. As for (c), a world - line is a regular curve (some may require just [itex]C^{2}[/itex] others may require [itex]C^{\infty }[/itex]) [itex]\gamma :I \rightarrow M[/itex] where M is the space - time and I is a non empty interval in R (we take intervals so that the domain is connected, which we want for obvious reasons).
 
Last edited:
Sorry to be nitpicking, but a collection of charts is an atlas, not an atals.
 
CompuChip said:
Sorry to be nitpicking, but a collection of charts is an atlas, not an atals.
Ah yes. I sincerely apologize for that. I don't know what gets into me sometimes :smile: My spelling is quite horrid as you can see lol; I'll have it fixed.
 
No problem, but you were misspelling it so consistently that I started wondering :)
 
Thank you for your answers

WannabeNewton said:
As for (c), a world - line is a regular curve (some may require just [itex]C^{2}[/itex] others may require [itex]C^{\infty }[/itex]) [itex]\gamma :I \rightarrow M[/itex] where M is the space - time and I is a non empty interval in R (we take intervals so that the domain is connected, which we want for obvious reasons).

These details do not bother me. I noted U what is noted M. The space-time is not just a topological manifold, we can say that this is a differentiable manifold.

Do you agree that (d) is an acceptable definition :

(d) A generalized physical space (a set of spatial positions) is a particular family of world lines of material bodies that never meet. For example, in general relativity, a generalized physical space of Rindler consists of world lines of a family of Rindler observers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#The_Rindler_observers

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Nana Dutchou said:
Do you agree that (d) is an acceptable definition :

(d) A generalized physical space (a set of spatial positions) is a particular family of world lines of material bodies that never meet.
While time - like and null - like geodesic congruences are defined on proper open subsets of the space - time (Wald and Carroll define it this way for example) I don't know if you can extend the congruence globally to cover the whole space - time but what you said is definitely true locally. Hopefully someone else can answer that part. Cheers!
 
WannabeNewton said:
While time - like and null - like geodesic congruences are defined on proper open subsets of the space - time (Wald and Carroll define it this way for example) I don't know if you can extend the congruence globally to cover the whole space - time but what you said is definitely true locally. Hopefully someone else can answer that part. Cheers!

I know that a world line of a material body is a time-like world line in GR. If we can locally define (on an open subset of space-time) a generalized physical space as a family of time-like world lines that never meet, maybe we can locally define a physical space as a family of time-like world lines which seems continuously immobile for a unique observer ?

Nana Dutchou said:
(e) To define a time variable in a generalized physical space we just have to choose a particular parametrization along each of his world lines or (in a corpuscular model) we just have to choose a particular parametrization along the world line of the body whose movement is studied.

For example, a Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P is a temporal variable (t) and a Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P' is another temporal variable (t'). A Poincaré-Einstein dating carried out by an experimenter P is a temporal variable obtained by this method : the date associated with an event A is the arithmetic mean of the dates of issuance and receipt by P of a light signal which is reflected in A.

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
965
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K