RL Circuit Differential equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for current in an RL circuit, specifically focusing on the differential equation governing the circuit's behavior. Participants are examining the relationship between current, resistance, and inductance over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the current equation and question the handling of the homogeneous and particular solutions. There is discussion about the initial conditions and the role of constants in the solution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights into the correct interpretation of initial conditions and constants in the equation. There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions regarding the behavior of the circuit at time t=0.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the initial conditions in the context of an RL circuit, particularly the continuity of current and the behavior immediately after the switch is closed. There is some confusion regarding the initial current value and the assumptions made about the circuit's operation.

IBY
Messages
106
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Basically, I am deriving the following equation:
[tex]I=I_0(1-e^{-\frac{R}{L}t})[/tex]

Homework Equations



1) [tex]L\frac{dI(t)}{dt}+I(t)R=V[/tex]
2) [tex]\frac{V}{R}=I_0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



In relevant equation 1), R was divided both sides, and by using 2), I turned it into:

[tex]\frac{L}{R}\frac{dI(t)}{dt}+I(t)=I_0[/tex]

By solving the homogenous part, I got:

[tex]I(t)=I_0e^{-\frac{R}{L}t}[/tex]

If so, with the non-homogenous part, I got:

[tex]I(t)=I_0+I_0e^{-\frac{R}{L}t}[/tex]

Obviously, something went wrong here because that plus sign is supposed to be a minus. The question is, what is the mistake?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The constant in the homogeneous part isn't I0. It's an arbitrary constant C that you solve for by using the initial condition.
 
But at initial condition, isn't [tex]C=I_0[/tex]?

After all, that is the current right when the switch closes in the circuit, causing the current to flow. Because all I am left with after solving the homogenous part is:

[tex]I=Ce^{-\frac{R}{L}t}[/tex]
 
No, the initial condition has to be satisfied by the complete solution, so you have

[tex]I(t) = V/R + Ce^{-\frac{R}{L} t}[/tex]

and you want to solve for C by setting I(0)=0 because the current through an inductor I(t) must be continuous. Note that the current isn't I0 at t=0 because there was no current flowing just prior to the switch closing.
 
Okay, so based on that, [tex]C=I(t)-I_0[/tex]?

Which means, substituting that into: [tex]I(t)=I_0+(I(t)-I_0)e^{-\frac{R}{L}t}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Uh oh, when I do the math above, I get [tex]I_0=I(t)[/tex]
 
When you set t=0, you get

[tex]I(0) = V/R + C[/tex]

You don't still have I(t) floating around.
 
But what is I(0), then? If I(0) is current at initial condition, then that is [tex]I_0[/tex]. That makes C=0.
Okay, I am doing this whole math logic thing really wrong somewhere, and I can't grasp where it is.
 
Reread what I said in post 4.
 
  • #10
Oh, if [tex]I(0)=0[/tex] because current doesn't exist at t=0, then [tex]C=-I_0[/tex].
Then [tex]I(t)=I_0-I_0e^{-\frac{R}{L}t}[/tex]
Thanks!
 
  • #11
D'oh! I have been assuming the graph was a decay all along just because the e was there. I forgot, this RL circuit is one with a battery. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K