Rocket Equation with varying gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rocket equation, specifically the formulation F_ext = m(dv/dt) + u(dm/dt), where m represents the rocket's mass, v is its velocity, u denotes the effective exhaust speed, and F_ext indicates external forces. The conversation highlights a derived differential equation, (d^2x/dt^2) + GMx^(-2) = up/(m0 - pt), which incorporates gravitational forces and a constant mass ejection rate p. Participants conclude that this second-order non-linear differential equation is not solvable analytically, a claim supported by preliminary analysis using Mathematica.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the rocket equation and its components
  • Familiarity with differential equations, particularly second-order non-linear types
  • Knowledge of gravitational forces and their mathematical representation
  • Experience using Mathematica for mathematical modeling and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for solving non-linear differential equations
  • Explore numerical solutions for differential equations using Mathematica
  • Study the implications of varying mass in rocket dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational forces on spacecraft trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and mathematicians interested in rocket dynamics and differential equations will benefit from this discussion.

Rudipoo
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
So, the rocket equation is

F_ext = m(dv/dt) + u(dm/dt)

where m is the mass of the rocket, v the velocity, u the effective exhaust gases speed, and F_ext the external forces on the system.

If we take a constant mass ejection rate p, and take the external force to be the gravitational attraction of a mass M, we recover the differential equation

(d^2x/dt^2) + GMx^(-2) = up/(m0 - pt)

where m0 is the initial mass (time t=0).

Can this type of differential equation be solved analytically? If so, how would one go about it?

Thanks,

Rudipoo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost positive it's not solvable analytically, seeing as it's 2nd order non-linear. A quick run through mathematica seems to support that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K