Rocket Thrust Balancing Gravity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 9K views
Piamedes
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket (initial mass m0) needs to use its engines ot hover stationary, just above the ground. If it can afford to burn no more than a mass (lamda)m0 of its fuel, for how long can it hover? If the exhaust velocity is 3000 m/s and lambda is 10% how long can the rocket hover?

Homework Equations


Thrust = [tex]v_{ex} \frac{dm}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]v_{ex}[/tex] is the exhaust velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



So starting off with the basic sum of forces equals zero:

[tex]\dot{m}v_{ex} = mg[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dm}{dt} = \frac{mg}{v_{ex}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dm}{m} = \frac{g dt}{v_{ex}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{v_{ex}} \int_{0}^{t} dt = \int_{m_{0}}^{m_{0} - \lambda m_{0}} \frac{dm}{m}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{v_{ex}} t = ln(m) ]_{m_{0}}^{m_{0} - \lambda m_{0}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{v_{ex}} t = ln [m_{0} - \lambda m_{0}] - ln [m_{0}][/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{v_{ex}} t = ln [\frac{m_{0} - \lambda m_{0}}{m_{0}}][/tex]

[tex]\frac{g}{v_{ex}} t = ln [ 1 - \lambda][/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{v_{ex}}{g} ln [ 1 - \lambda][/tex]

And here is where I encounter an issue. Since lambda will always be positive, regardless of how much fuel the rocket can expend this equation will give a negative time. Does anyone see where I went wrong with the calculations, or are my original assumptions wrong?

Thanks for any and all help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So if I carry along the negative associated with the decreasing mass, then the last few steps would be:

[tex](-) t = \frac{v_{ex}}{g} ln [ 1 - \lambda][/tex]

[tex]t = - \frac{v_{ex}}{g} ln [ 1 - \lambda][/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{v_{ex}}{g} ln [ (1 - \lambda)^(-1)][/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{v_{ex}}{g} ln [ \frac{1}{1 - \lambda}][/tex]

And that would give a positive value for time. This equation makes sense, but is it a proper solution?