Roller Coaster/Energy conservation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass sliding down a frictionless track and navigating a circular loop. The objective is to determine the minimum height required for the block to complete the loop without falling off, expressed as a multiple of the loop's radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy principles, considering kinetic and potential energy, but struggles with the initial setup. Participants discuss the necessary conditions for maintaining minimum speed at the top of the loop and the relationship between radial acceleration and gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and clarifications. There is recognition of the need to incorporate gravitational potential energy into the energy conservation equations. The discussion is progressing with constructive feedback, although a definitive solution has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the dynamics of circular motion and energy conservation, with participants questioning the assumptions about energy distribution at different points in the loop.

Jordanosaur
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi All -

Here's the problem I have:

A block of mass m slides down a frictionless track, then around the inside of a circular loop-the-loop of radius R. What minimum height h
must the block have to make a full run around the loop without falling off? The answer is to be given as a multiple of R.

I think that this problem should be easy, but I guess I'm not seeing the right angle of approach yet. I know that the minimum speed for the coaster to make a full run would be sqrt(Rg), and I think that the solution could be obtained though KE (1/2mv^2) and PE(mgh) laws. However, I can't see the right place to start on this one. If anyone can give me a pointer in the right direction, I would appreciate it. I am certainly not looking for a free solution, just a hint or two would be great.

Thanks

Jordan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are exactly right that you want to use conservation laws. Here's one hint. The speed of the block when it reaches the top of the loop has to have a minimum value. Its radial acceleration around the loop has to equal the acceleration of gravity or it will fall off. What's a formula for the acceleration of a body in circular motion? Add that to your conservation equations.
 
Thanks for your response!

So the radial acceleration in circular motion is (v^2/R), and when it is set equal to the acceleration of gravity, you can conclude that Vmin = sqrt (gR).

Now, I'm thinking that we need to know the velocity at the bottom of the ramp entering the loop, and we can find the height of the ramp from that:

1/2m(sqrt(gr))^2 = mgh

= 1/2mgr = mgh

mg cancels, and we arrive at h = 1/2 R, but I know that's not right as the answer is supposed to be 2.5R.

This the first problem I have tried to use conservation laws related to circular motion, and I'm definitely missing a vital part of theory that applies to this type of problem - I know that the accel. in the loop must equal gravity, and that the height of the ramp is responsible for accruing the minimum loop-entrance velocity to allow a full revolution.

Any further suggestions?

Thanks again
 
It doesn't have just kinetic energy at the top of the loop. It needs extra gravitational potential energy to climb from the bottom of the loop to the top. How much? Then put it in here:

1/2m(sqrt(gr))^2+PE = mgh
 
Beautiful -

That's exactly what i was missing - It totally makes sense as the PE is increasing as the KE goes down toward the top of the coaster. That's what I didn't think to factor into the final equation.

I really appreciate your help, and you have saved me a couple extra hours of head scratching.

Jordan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
3K