Rolling Motion without slipping Problem

AI Thread Summary
A small rubber wheel drives a large pottery wheel without slipping, with the rubber wheel having a radius of 2.0 cm and an angular acceleration of 7.2 rad/s². The tangential speeds at the edges of both wheels must be equal due to the no-slip condition, allowing the calculation of the pottery wheel's angular acceleration. The pottery wheel's angular acceleration is determined to be 0.576 rad/s², leading to a time of approximately 11.82 seconds for it to reach a speed of 65 rpm. The calculations involve using the relationships between tangential speed, angular speed, and angular acceleration. The forum discussion highlights the importance of understanding these relationships for solving rolling motion problems.
adca14
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small rubber wheel is used to drive a large pottery wheel, and they are mounted so that their circular edges touch. The small wheel has a radius of 2.0cm and accelerates at a rate of , and it is in contact with pottery wheel (radius 25.0 cm)without slipping. Calculate (a) the angular acceleration of the pottery wheel, and (b) the time it takes the pottery wheel to reach its required speed of 65 rpm.

r for small rubber ball = 2cm = .02m
r for large pottery ball = 25cm = .25m
\alpha for small rubber ball = 7.2 rad/s^{}2
\alpha for large pottery ball = ?
t_{}1 = 0s
t_{}f = ?
\omega for small rubber ball = ?
\omega for large pottery ball = ?
\ell = ?
\theta = ?

Homework Equations


v=r\omega
\theta = \ell/r
\omega^{}2 = \omega_{}o^{}2 + 2\alpha\theta
\alpha = \omega^{}2 - \omega_{}o^{}2/2\theta

The Attempt at a Solution



My book said that under certain circumstances \ell=2\pir
So i plugged 2\pi(.02m) = .12m

Than to solve for \theta, I did \ell/r or .12/.02 = 6.28

To get \omega I did \omega^{}2 = \omega_{}o^{}2 + 2\alpha\theta I set the first \omega to zero isolated \omega^{}2 by taking the square root to both sides, plugged everything in, \sqrt{}2(7.2)(6.28) and I got 9.51 rad/s

Then to solve for v, I used v=r\omega, plugged it in, .02(9.51), and got .19

Then to get \omega for the pottery wheel I used \omega = v/r, plugged it in, .19/.25, and got .76

For \alpha, I used \omega^{}2/2\theta and got .045

this doesn't look right, I hope I did it right though, any help would be appreciated, again thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming that the two wheels are starting at rest, though the problem says nothing about that (but it would be typical for a problem of this sort).

The condition that the wheels are in contact and roll against each other without slipping means that the linear or tangential speeds at the edges of the two wheels are the same. So you know that \omega_{rub} = \omega_{pot} = 0 at t = 0 . You also know the relation between tangential speed at the edge of each wheel and its angular speed; what is it?

You can know set up an equation for the tangential speed of the edge of each wheel, given that each has a constant angular acceleration. You know \alpha_{rub}, so you can now find \alpha_{pot}. Once you have that, you can find how long it will take for the pottery wheel, starting from rest, to reach 65 rpm (which is how many radians per second?).
 
Last edited:
I got it, the relation with the tangential speed at the edge of each wheel was what I needed. I set the tangential accelerations of both equal to each other and got it, .576, then I i used w = w0 + at and got t, 11.8s, thanks again, if it weren't for this forum, I'd be in a jam.
 
adca14 said:
I got it, the relation with the tangential speed at the edge of each wheel was what I needed. I set the tangential accelerations of both equal to each other and got it, .576, then I i used w = w0 + at and got t, 11.8s, thanks again, if it weren't for this forum, I'd be in a jam.

I think you mean that you "set the tangential velocities equal to each other".

Yes, I get 0.576 rad/(sec^2) for the pottery wheel's angular acceleration, so it runs up to speed in 11.82 seconds.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top