Rolling Sphere On Incline

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular velocity of a solid sphere rolling down an incline. The user derived the equation mgh=1/2MR^2ω^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)ω^2 but obtained incorrect omega values of 111.09 and 114.09. Participants pointed out the necessity of including units in calculations and suggested verifying the height (h) used in the equations. They recommended drawing a diagram to clarify the correct height measurement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accuracy in both calculations and understanding the physical setup.
Randomized10
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations
I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE
I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Randomized10 said:
Homework Statement: An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations: I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE

I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
Numbers without units are meaningless. Please repost with units this time and when you do, show more details.

Also, why do you think h = 1.7 or even cos(17)*1.7 ? Draw a diagram and see what h is.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K