Rolling Sphere On Incline

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular velocity of a solid sphere rolling down an incline. The user derived the equation mgh=1/2MR^2ω^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)ω^2 but obtained incorrect omega values of 111.09 and 114.09. Participants pointed out the necessity of including units in calculations and suggested verifying the height (h) used in the equations. They recommended drawing a diagram to clarify the correct height measurement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accuracy in both calculations and understanding the physical setup.
Randomized10
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations
I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE
I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Randomized10 said:
Homework Statement: An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations: I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE

I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
Numbers without units are meaningless. Please repost with units this time and when you do, show more details.

Also, why do you think h = 1.7 or even cos(17)*1.7 ? Draw a diagram and see what h is.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K