Rolling Sphere On Incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular velocity of a solid sphere rolling down an incline. The user derived the equation mgh=1/2MR^2ω^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)ω^2 but obtained incorrect omega values of 111.09 and 114.09. Participants pointed out the necessity of including units in calculations and suggested verifying the height (h) used in the equations. They recommended drawing a diagram to clarify the correct height measurement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accuracy in both calculations and understanding the physical setup.
Randomized10
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations
I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE
I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Randomized10 said:
Homework Statement: An 8.6-cm-diameter, 320 g solid sphere is released from rest at the top of a 1.7-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom. What is the angular velocity of the sphere at the bottom?
Relevant Equations: I=2/5MR^2
LKE=1/2Mv^2
RKE=1/2Iomega^2
mgh=LKE+RKE

I did some algebra and got the final equation mgh=1/2MR^2omega^2+1/2(2/5MR^2)omega^2, then plugged in the numbers and got an omega value of 111.09. Using 1.7 as h instead of cos(17)*1.7=1.63 I got 114.09. Both answers were wrong. Am I missing something, or did I just screw up the math?
Numbers without units are meaningless. Please repost with units this time and when you do, show more details.

Also, why do you think h = 1.7 or even cos(17)*1.7 ? Draw a diagram and see what h is.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top