Rolls Royce Trent Engine Technology

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Technology
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
20 replies · 9K views

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org
kach22i said:
I like pages 11 and 34 very much.

Page 34: Electric Jet Engine...where does the juice come from?

It looks like it means driving the compressor (and fan) electrically, presumably from power taken from the main engine shaft.
I suppose this must be more efficient/simpler somehow but I don't see it!
 
kach22i said:
I like pages 11 and 34 very much.

Page 34: Electric Jet Engine...where does the juice come from?

Does the word "GENERATOR" on page 34 answer your question?

The total power output of a large 4-engine a/c at takeoff is about 200 MW. Running an aircraft aircon system isn't a big deal, by comparison.
 
mgb_phys said:
It looks like it means driving the compressor (and fan) electrically, presumably from power taken from the main engine shaft.
I suppose this must be more efficient/simpler somehow but I don't see it!

No, the fan and compressor are still mechanically driven.

The big saving is getting rid of all the mechanical drives for fuel and oil pumps etc. The basic problem there is that the main shafts of the machine are concentric and buried in the middle of all the working parts so taking a mechanical drive off them to run pumps, gearboxes, electrical generators, etc on the outside of the engine is messy.

The lubrication system has the same basic design problem - there's no easy way of getting oil to and from the bearings. The REALLY big prize would be to have no oil system at all - in principle, magnetic bearings don't need lubrication, period.
 
AlephZero said:
No, the fan and compressor are still mechanically driven.

The big saving is getting rid of all the mechanical drives for fuel and oil pumps etc.

Ok - I thought it was the next step beyond a three shaft engine was to drive, say the compressor electrically so it's speed can be more quickly and precisely controlled.

ps. Are the generators/pumps etc driven by a right angle side shaft coming out of the central shaft? I can see how that would be fun to install/maintain.
Could you make a generator by fitting magnets/coils to the outer edge of the fans and put fixed coils around the outside, turn the whole engine into a large squirrel cage motor?
 
Last edited:
mgb_phys said:
ps. Are the generators/pumps etc driven by a right angle side shaft coming out of the central shaft? I can see how that would be fun to install/maintain.

You got it. As well as being "fun", accessory failures are a significant cause of engine shutdowns, so zapping them would be very good for reliability.

Could you make a generator by fitting magnets/coils to the outer edge of the fans and put fixed coils around the outside, turn the whole engine into a large squirrel cage motor?

EEK! The tips of the fan blades have a radial acceleration of something like 9,000g. Putting extra weights on them is probably not a good idea! (Check for yourself - r.omega^2 where r = 50 inches and omega = 3,000 RPM)

Also, you wouldn't want to increase the overall diameter of the intake. The size is limited by ground clearance, for under-wing engines. The engines make excellent vacuum cleaners for keeping airport runways spotlessly clean already - that functionality doesn't need to be improved.
 
AlephZero said:
EEK! The tips of the fan blades have a radial acceleration of something like 9,000g. Putting extra weights on them is probably not a good idea! (Check for yourself - r.omega^2 where r = 50 inches and omega = 3,000 RPM)
That's only about the same as steam turbines in a power plant - and they are much bigger.

The engines make excellent vacuum cleaners for keeping airport runways spotlessly clean already - that functionality doesn't need to be improved.
I thought their main use was as buffers for careless luggage cart drivers and to keep the airports free of birds!

I did see a RR Trent being fitted as a backup power generator, basically the only modification was to bolt it down REALLY securely.
 
mgb_phys said:
That's only about the same as steam turbines in a power plant - and they are much bigger.

And also much heavier!
 
There is no right angle driveshaft to a remote power source shown.

I could be wrong but what I think I see on page 34 is combustion ignition in the second stage which in turn drives turbines (no compressor ahead of it).

The generator in the tail cone drives aircraft systems by feeding off the compressor shaft.

The electric motor driving the big inlet fan gets it's juice from where?
...............

Page 38 for the blended wing concept seems to have a "gas generator" in the tail section. I'm not sure if I'd call this turbo-fan or turbo-prop, the prop actualy being a ducted fan in this case.

What do you call a gas turbine driven helicopter?
 
kach22i said:
There is no right angle driveshaft to a remote power source shown.

Correct. The point is to get rid of the angle drive shaft that is in most existing gas turbine designs.

I could be wrong but what I think I see on page 34 is combustion ignition in the second stage which in turn drives turbines (no compressor ahead of it).

Yes, you could be wrong - in fact you are wrong.

The electric motor driving the big inlet fan gets it's juice from where?

I already posted that the fan isn't driven by an electric motor! And I ought to know, I haven't looked at all the slides but I wouldn't be surprised to find that I drew some of them.
 
AlephZero said:
I already posted that the fan isn't driven by an electric motor!
Q1: The electric motor connected to the first large inlet fan is actually an electric generator drawing power from the shaft which is turning via the combustion of gases passing through the compressor blades?

Q2: What is the "electric" motor providing power to?

Q3: Generators (not motors) convert mechanical motion into electricity, right?

Statement-1: I thought motors drove things!
 
kach22i said:
Q1: The electric motor connected to the first large inlet fan is actually an electric generator drawing power from the shaft which is turning via the combustion of gases passing through the compressor blades?
The mechanical energy from the turbine drives the compressor/fan and generator. The fan and the exhaust of the turbine provide thrust for forward motion.

Q2: What is the "electric" motor providing power to?
Lights, avionics, basically anything electrical or electronic on the aircraft.

Q3: Generators (not motors) convert mechanical motion into electricity, right?
Right.

Statement-1: I thought motors drove things!
Motors convert electrical energy into mechanical energy, which is the reverse of a generator.
 
Astronuc said:
The mechanical energy from the turbine drives the compressor/fan and generator...Motors convert electrical energy into mechanical energy, which is the reverse of a generator.

Should the first electric motor be labeled a generator then?

If both motors are acting as generators, why two?
 
A three shaft engine. We ran one a few years back. Too bad the project got canceled.

Aleph, your new swept fan design is pretty incredible compared to ours. I thought ours were getting a bit radical, but that mid span "bump" in there is quite large. Very cool.

It's "interesting" to see the slide on the tiled wall combustor. :wink:
 
From another forum I posted this same topic in...Carnuts.US

El.Lobo said:
"Internal active magnetic bearings and motor/generators replace conventional bearings, oil system and gearboxes ...I'm assuming this is for things like starting the engine and perhaps even as a safety measure to keep rpms under that red-line.

So that first motor may act as:

1. Electric transmission (gear reduction unit).

2. Starter motor

3. Generator (like regenerative braking the shaft).

4. RPM regulator

The second unit in the tail cone is just a parasite, converting rotational motion into current.
 
I believe the purpose of motor/generator sets in forward section has strictly to do with 'active bearings', but I'll defer to AlephZero and FredGarvin on that.

The generator in the aft section provides necessary power, I believe, so it's not exactly parasitic - it provides a necessary function.

For starting, aircraft use external power supplies or on-board auxilliary power systems, i.e. small turbine-generators, usually located in the tail section.
 
I could take a guess, but we do not have an engine that incorporates those technologies yet, so I leave that to AlephZero.
 
Astronuc is right. You can think of an active magnetic bearing as a sort of motor. You use electrical power to keep the rotating shaft centralized inside a ring of magnets. But the "motor" does not provide any power to rotate the shaft.

There would be other electric motors to drive engine accessories like the fuel and oil pumps. These are driven mechanically in current engine designs. (Even though magnetic bearings greatly reduce the lubrication requirements, I think it will be a little while before anybody builds a completely "oil-free" engine!)

Also aircraft cabin air would come from an independent electrically powered system, rather than being tapped off from the engine compressors as at present.

The red block at the right of slide 34 is the generator (driven by the engine fanshaft) to power all these devices.

There is no way you would even think about driving the engine fan electrically. The idea of replacing a simple steel shaft with a 50MW electrical generator connected to a 50MW motor is ... well, let's say it's not engineering.
 
FredGarvin said:
A three shaft engine. We ran one a few years back. Too bad the project got canceled.

Yeah, we have those as well!

Aleph, your new swept fan design is pretty incredible compared to ours. I thought ours were getting a bit radical, but that mid span "bump" in there is quite large. Very cool.

In one of our training/conference facilities there's a little historical museum. Once of the nice exhibits is a complete WWII Merlin piston engine (V-12 arragement, max power about 1MW) next to one of those fan blades (max power per blade about 2MW). Well, that's progress.

Just to point out the date on that presentation is 2000, so it's not giving away any recent secrets. And there are a couple more Trent engines in the family now, the 900 (Airbus A380) and 1000 (Boeing 787).
 

Similar threads

Rolls-Royce Trent-1000 Engine Issues - British Air cancels flights

  • Astronuc
  • · Replies 3 ·
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
3

Engine fire on Cathay Pacific CX383, Airbus A350, Rolls-Royce XWB-97

  • Astronuc
  • · Replies 5 ·
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
5