Steam engines -- A new idea, maybe....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the use of water as a working fluid in steam engines and explores alternative substances with lower boiling points, such as Acetaldehyde and Methyl Bromide. Participants consider the implications of using these alternatives for energy generation, particularly in relation to efficiency and safety.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the exclusive use of water in steam engines, suggesting that other substances with lower boiling points could be more efficient.
  • Another participant argues that larger temperature differences are necessary for efficient thermodynamic engines, implying that lower boiling points may not be beneficial.
  • A suggestion is made for a system that uses ambient temperature to cycle a working fluid, potentially powering home air conditioning systems.
  • It is proposed that an inverted hydrothermal plant could harness energy from lower boiling point substances, though concerns about the size and cost of such a system are raised.
  • A participant references the "organic Rankine cycle" as a method for using alternative working fluids at lower temperatures, mentioning common refrigerants used in these systems.
  • Another participant notes that while the idea of using lower boiling point fluids is not new, it has not been successful due to various challenges.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety and toxicity of alternatives like Methyl Bromide, which is restricted due to its harmful effects.
  • One participant mentions that while water can cause corrosion, additives can mitigate this issue, making water a safer choice for external combustion engines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the viability and efficiency of using alternative working fluids in steam engines. While some acknowledge the potential of lower boiling point substances, others emphasize the challenges and limitations associated with them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality of these alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the economic viability of capturing waste heat and the safety concerns surrounding certain chemicals. The discussion also touches on the historical context of alternative working fluids and their past failures.

Dream Relics
Messages
27
Reaction score
3
Why do we use water for steam engines? Why not something else?

So, I have a question, or maybe it is an idea that i would like to share. So, sure, there are many finer points to the engineering of a steam turbine to make them work efficiently, and no doubt the designs have improved much since the invention of the steam engine. Also, as we all know, Nuclear reactors are just steam engines with a far more complicated and dangerous form of fire in them. Which once I realized that, I have to say, I was far less impressed with nuclear energy as a thing. But I digress. Here is my idea/question. Why use water for steam engines. The boiling point of water is 212 degrees and that is pretty hot. Hot enough that it requires burning fuel to achieve that temp. But there are lots of things with lower boiling points. Like Acetaldehyde for instance. It boils at 69 degrees. Or Methyl Bromide. It boils at 38 degrees. Seems to me one could set up a system that temp shields a condensation tank to cycle the substance back through in a loop and generate electricity with no fuel just using the ambient temperature of any given day if you use the right substance. For instance, with the Acetaldehyde, which is abundantly found in nature, one might be able to make a unit attached to a home, say for the AC, and when the temp rises above 69 the unit would kick on, power the AC and cool the house. Maybe part of it would need to run into underground pipes or something so the substance can cool and cycle back through again. I don't know know how it would work exactly, I am not an engineer, I am just a creative thinker. But this seems like a good idea. There seem to be some chemicals which boil at below freezing temps. Why can't we not build a turbine to run on those that would run in the winter? perhaps a large power plant that employs a variety of these different boiling point elements to just run on the ambient temperature even as the weather and temperature change. Someone tell me why this wouldn't work.

Bear in mind, I am not an engineer. So I am not asking for advise so that I can build it. That is never going to happen. I am more interested in just hearing whether or not this would work and getting the idea out there so that some of you smart people might build it if it is in fact a workable idea. I am just an idea person.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Dream Relics said:
Why do we use water for steam engines? Why not something else?
Water makes a good working fluid because it holds a lot of heat when it is converted to steam and boils at a relatively low temperature.
But there are lots of things with lower boiling points. Like Acetaldehyde for instance. It boils at 69 degrees. Or Methyl Bromide. It boils at 38 degrees.
Lower boiling points aren't necessarily helpful. For any thermodynamic engine, larger temperature differences make for more efficient engines. Think of the temperature difference like the height of a dam: the higher the dam (the wider the temperature difference), the more energy available to harness and the more efficient the harnessing of it.
Seems to me one could set up a system that temp shields a condensation tank to cycle the substance back through in a loop and generate electricity with no fuel just using the ambient temperature of any given day if you use the right substance. For instance, with the Acetaldehyde, which is abundantly found in nature, one might be able to make a unit attached to a home, say for the AC, and when the temp rises above 69 the unit would kick on, power the AC and cool the house. Maybe part of it would need to run into underground pipes or something so the substance can cool and cycle back through again.
You could run a sort of inverted hydrothermal plant that way, yes. The energy would be free, but it would need to be an extremely large device to generate a useful amount of power. It would be very expensive (as regular geothermal power is).
 
Okay. That makes sense. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Dream Relics said:
Or Methyl Bromide. It boils at 38 degrees.
Methyl Bromide was used as a fire extinguishing gas in WW2. It also destroys genetic material, so is now a restricted material. It is still used as a fumigant to sterilise soil, but only because it is the least dangerous agent available.

The major problem with water is corrosion, but additives solve that problem in closed systems. Water is the safest liquid available for use in external combustion engines. Everything else is more expensive, toxic or corrosive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K