Roots of Cubic & Quartic Polynomials - Finding Sums & Expanding

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rock.freak667
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding sums of roots for cubic and quartic polynomials, specifically exploring methods to calculate higher powers of roots without direct expansion. Participants examine the relationships between coefficients and roots, and the correctness of polynomial expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present the sums of roots for cubic polynomials as \(\sum \alpha = \frac{-b}{a}\), \(\sum \alpha\beta = \frac{c}{a}\), and \(\sum \alpha\beta\gamma = \frac{-d}{a}\).
  • One participant questions the method to find \(\alpha^9 + \beta^9 + \gamma^9\) without expansion.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial expansion of a quartic polynomial was incorrect, but does not specify how.
  • Several participants engage in correcting and refining the polynomial expansion, with one providing a detailed alternative expansion method.
  • Newton's sums are mentioned as a potential method for efficiently calculating sums of powers of roots.
  • There is a discussion about the notation used for sums of roots, with clarifications provided regarding the meaning of \(\sum \alpha\) and \(\sum \alpha\beta\).
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about deriving expressions for higher sums beyond the third using Newton's sums.
  • Another participant outlines the recursive relationships for Newton's sums, indicating how to derive sums up to \(S_9\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the correctness of the polynomial expansions, and there are multiple competing views regarding the best methods to find sums of roots and powers of roots. The discussion remains unresolved on certain points, particularly the clarity of notation and the correctness of expansions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over notation and the steps involved in polynomial expansion, indicating potential limitations in understanding the relationships between roots and coefficients. There are unresolved issues regarding the correctness of specific expansions and the application of Newton's sums.

rock.freak667
Homework Helper
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31
Considering the roots of a cubic polynomial([itex]ax^3+bx^2+cx+d[/itex]),[itex]\alpha,\beta,\gamma[/itex]

[tex]\sum \alpha=\frac{-b}{a}[/tex]

[tex]\sum \alpha\beta=\frac{c}{a}[/tex]

[tex]\sum \alpha\beta\gamma=\frac{-d}{a}[/tex]

If I have those sums of roots..and I am told to find [itex]\alpha^9+\beta^9+\gamma^9[/tex] is there any easy way to find this without having to expand?<br /> <br /> and also for a quartic polynomial<br /> when I expand [itex](x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)[/itex]<br /> I get:<br /> [tex]x^4-(\alpha+\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delta+\beta\gamma)x^3+(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delta+\beta\delta)x^2 -(\alpha\beta\gamma+\alpha\beta\delta+\alpha\gamma\delta+\gamma\delta\beta)x+\alpha\beta\gamma\delta[/tex]<br /> for -x^3 I am supposed to get the sum of the roots...yet I expanded correctly, where did i go wrong?[/itex]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
On the last bit, you obviously didn't expand correctly, but with no intermediate steps, I don't see how one could say where you went wrong, exactly.
 
Oh I thought I typed it out well this is it

[tex](x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)<br /> <br /> =(x^2-(\alpha+\beta)+)(x^2-(\gamma\delta)+(\gamma\delta)[/tex]

=[tex]x^4-(\alpha+\beta)x^3+\alpha\beta x^2<br /> -(\alpha+\beta)(\gamma+\delta)x^3+(\alpha+\beta)(\gamma+\delta)x^2-\alpha\beta(\gamma+\delta)x<br /> <br /> +\alpha\gamma x^2-\gamma\delta(\alpha+\beta)x+\alpha\beta\gamma\delta[/tex]

=

[tex]x^4-(\alpha+\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delt a+\beta\gamma)x^3+(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta+\alpha \gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delta+\beta\delta)x^2 -(\alpha\beta\gamma+\alpha\beta\delta+\alpha\gamma\ delta+\gamma\delta\beta)x+\alpha\beta\gamma\delta[/tex]
 
Something is wrong in your expansion. Try:
[tex](x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d) = (x^2 - (a+b)x + ab)(x^2 - (c+d)x + cd)[/tex]
[tex]= x^4 - (c+d)x^3 + cdx^2 - (a+b)x^3 + (a+b)(c+d)x^2 - cd(a+b)x + abx^2 - ab(c+d)x + abcd[/tex]
[tex]= x^4 - (a+b+c+d)x^3 + (ab + cd + ac + ad + bc + bd)x^2 - (acd + bcd + abc + abd)x + abcd[/tex]
which is what you'd expect.

For the first problem, try using the http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/Newton_sums" trick.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rock.freak667 said:
Oh I thought I typed it out well this is it

[tex](x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)<br /> <br /> =(x^2-(\alpha+\beta)+)(x^2-(\gamma\delta)+(\gamma\delta)[/tex]

The very first line is your mistake. This should be

[tex](x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)<br /> <br /> =(x^2-(\alpha+\beta)x+\alpha\beta)(x^2-(\gamma+ \delta)x+ \gamma\delta)[/tex]
 
No, I typed it wrongly, on paper I expanded it and found my error...so thanks...

but is there any general formula that will give me the sums of the roots in a form that I need rather than having to expand it?
 
Read the page I linked to about Newton sums. There's nothing faster than that, I think; that method allows you to calculate that kind of stuff pretty quickly though.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Considering the roots of a cubic polynomial([itex]ax^3+bx^2+cx+d[/itex]),[itex]\alpha,\beta,\gamma[/itex]

[tex]\sum \alpha=\frac{-b}{a}[/tex]

[tex]\sum \alpha\beta=\frac{c}{a}[/tex]

[tex]\sum \alpha\beta\gamma=\frac{-d}{a}[/tex]

If I have those sums of roots..and I am told to find [itex]\alpha^9+\beta^9+\gamma^9[/tex] is there any easy way to find this without having to expand?<br /> <br /> and also for a quartic polynomial<br /> when I expand [itex](x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)[/itex]<br /> I get:<br /> [tex]x^4-(\alpha+\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delta+\beta\gamma)x^3+(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma+\alpha\delta+\beta\delta)x^2 -(\alpha\beta\gamma+\alpha\beta\delta+\alpha\gamma\delta+\gamma\delta\beta)x+\alpha\beta\gamma\delta[/tex]<br /> for -x^3 I am supposed to get the sum of the roots...yet I expanded correctly, where did i go wrong?[/itex]
[itex] <br /> I have to admit that I do not understand your notation. If the 3 roots are [itex]\alpha, \beta, \gamma[/itex] Then what do your sums mean?[/itex]
 
Oh well...
[itex]\sum \alpha[/itex] is simply the sum of the roots taking one at a time, i.e.[itex]\alpha+\beta+\gamma[/itex]

and well [itex]\sum \alpha\beta[/itex] is the sum of the roots taking two at a time, i.e. [itex]\alpha\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma[/itex]

and for Newton's sums

I get up to the 3rd sum formula

but I don't get how I would find an expression to find S[itex]_9[/itex] or for 4 and higher
 
  • #10
So, in the notation of that link, [tex]a_{n-k}[/tex] is the sum of the products of roots taking [tex]k[/tex] at a time. In your cubic equation, [tex]a_3 = a, a_2 = b, a_1 = c, a_0 = d[/tex]. Using the Newton sum equations, you can find [tex]S_1, S_2[/tex] and so on, up through [tex]S_9[/tex], which is what you asked for.

[tex]aS_1 + b = 0[/tex]
[tex]aS_2 + bS_1 + 2c = 0[/tex]
[tex]aS_3 + bS_2 + cS_1 + 3d = 0[/tex]
[tex]aS_4 + bS_3 + cS_2 + dS_1 = 0[/tex] (there's nothing after [tex]d[/tex])
[tex]aS_5 + bS_4 + cS_3 + dS_2 = 0[/tex]
...
So you should be able to get all the way to [tex]S_9[/tex] on your own this way.
 
  • #11
ah ok...but if there was something after d it would be
[tex]aS_5 + bS_4 + cS_3 + dS_2 + eS_1 = 0[/tex] ?
 
  • #12
right
 
  • #13
oh thanks, then...this is a real help...Now i can do my roots of polynomials questions even faster now

Edit: so in general the sums would be like this

[tex]aS_n + bS_{n-1}+cS_{n-2}+...+ n[/tex]*(The term independent of x in polynomial)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K