Rosetta's comet mission discussion thread

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
205 replies · 32K views
Dotini said:
A friend on another forum informs me it's on the surface, but moving around some.

It's a Rover! :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This so cool. :)
- Oops OK, looking at the news again!
 
The latest that I am seeing from the ESA site is the notice of touchdown by the Philae probe. Is there anything more recent information available?
 
It's hard to find anything other than some unofficial speculation about Philae having bounced when it landed.But that aside, I think that it may be possible to get some good estimates of how the comet's gravitational field varies. The Rosetta team has released a 3D model of the comet, Measuring comet 67P/C-G | Rosetta - ESA's comet chaser, and one can use a voxelizer like "binvox" on it to find a voxel representation of it. A voxel is a 3D pixel. One can then calculate the comet's gravity by assuming something like constant density then integrating over the voxels found for it.

http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~min/binvox/ is open source, but I've had trouble getting it to work in OSX Yosemite, the latest version. Even compiling it has trouble.

From Rosetta's motions, the Rosetta team has likely calculated some of the multipole coefficients of the comet's gravitational field. But I haven't seen them published anywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SciFi channel said they picked site J. Not sure but I think it's on top of the large lobe.
 
Emily Lakdawalla, Senior Editor & Planetary Evangelist, The Planetary Society. Planetary scientist, writer, public speaker,
is in Darmstadt Germany making reports via Twitter also.
I don't think she sleeps.

IMG_0359_pp_square_normal.jpg
Emily Lakdawalla @elakdawalla · 7h
! ... ! ... ! RT @Philae_ROMAP: @Philae_ROMAP magnetic field analysis revealed 3 landings at 15:33, 17:26 and 17:33 UTC

IMG_0359_pp_square_normal.jpg
Emily Lakdawalla @elakdawalla · 11h
I seem to have picked up >5000 new followers today :O Welcome, all of you, and I hope you like planetary exploration and space photos.​

One of them was me.

I was just listening to a BBC broadcast recorded yesterday following the landing. One of the commentators said that the landing itself was an experiment. ~9:45 - 10:15.
At 44 minutes, it's a bit long, but they discussed a lot of interesting things, with a lot of excited scientists.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Google changed their logo doodle to a Rosetta animation
they rushed
 
I've not yet seen a photograph taken from the landing site...
 
If the photo from the surface, linked above, has any resemblance to what a human eye would perceive it appears as might be expected at such great distance that the amount of sunlight is akin to something like Full Moon at night on Earth. As small as the lander is the surface area of photovoltaic cells is even smaller. ESA has stated they are already collecting electrical energy. Are these some sort of high performance cells? or is the unit designed with extreme! low power requirements... or both?
 
enorbet said:
If the photo from the surface, linked above, has any resemblance to what a human eye would perceive it appears as might be expected at such great distance that the amount of sunlight is akin to something like Full Moon at night on Earth. As small as the lander is the surface area of photovoltaic cells is even smaller. ESA has stated they are already collecting electrical energy. Are these some sort of high performance cells? or is the unit designed with extreme! low power requirements... or both?
Here's a paper on the solar cells aboard Rosetta and Philae, which have a reported ~20% efficiency.
http://www.astrodynamics.eu/Astrodynamics.eu/Conference_Papers_files/Topputo-Paper-2009-2.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: enorbet
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30034060#

Evidently Philae bounced a kilometer up off the surface and remained in flight for almost two hours as the comet rotated under it. So they are still trying to determine its exact location. The harpoons and ice screws still aren't deployed, so drilling experiments are canceled for the moment since it is untethered and too unstable. In the photo, you see a foot with an ice screw pointed "up", I suppose.

About the surface, I've seen a comment about what appeared to be a gooey or melted look, maybe toward the lower right in magnification. But mainly it looks like rocks to me.

http://www.esa.int/var/esa/storage/...omet/15048351-1-eng-GB/Welcome_to_a_comet.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcus
At 0.4 grams centimeter^-3 average density, rock stretches credulity. And a micro-G makes down on its side a good question.
 
Yes, the presser just announced that Philae's location on 67P is still unknown, "Maybe tomorrow."

Solar arrays are "not illuminated" so power duration is limited.
 
Last edited:
Jonathan Scott said:
Given that it apparently bounced and that the momentum flywheel was being spun down, I hope that any "final" landing will be the right way up. I'd have thought a shape like that would only have a small chance of landing on its feet if it started tumbling.

Seems I was unfortunately right in my guess yesterday. Not only is it on its side, but it is also in shade a lot of the time, so the batteries are unlikely to last for long.

I don't know how much capability they have to move stuff, but they might be able to "twitch" it at least back to a more vertical position, as it would require very little force.
 
I believe that the battery has 60 hours capacity. Where is the suggestion that Philae is "on its side", that is its normal force outside the area of its feet? The question of a "twitch" was asked at the presser, and I took the answer as not having that capability. The possibility of approaching escape velocity inadvertently is real and of concern.
 
http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2014/11/First_comet_panoramic

As mentioned in this afternoon's press conference, one of the panorama pictures is almost entirely sky and one to the side of it appears to be some sort of overhanging cliffs from the sun angle (you need to turn up brightness to see them) and a lander leg apparently pointing upwards. The pictures in the opposite direction are apparently of a surface close to the camera, presumably underneath the lander.

I don't think the lander has any official capability to do anything which would help it right itself, but I think there are bits which can be rotated or extended which might be used as a last resort.
 
EU2AA said:
Yes, the comet is not going anywhere. But we are talking about Philae ...

Yeah. I meant Philae. Was feeling sleepy.
 
Scroll down. One can see the lens flare OmCheeto mentioned. Probably just a guess as to the orientation.
this is the link Doug Huffman gave a few posts back.
.
Comet_panoramic_lander_orientation.jpg
 
The top left corner needs brightening to see anything. They showed on the presentation today that if it's lightened up, one can see what appear to be overhanging cliffs.
 

Similar threads

High School "Snow" on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko is actually stars
  • Keith_McClary
  • · Replies 4 ·
  • Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
2K
NASA NASA finalists for New Frontiers: Rosetta's comet or Titan
  • mfb
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Discussing Juno/JunoCam Mission and Jupiter Data
  • 1oldman2
  • · Replies 112 ·
  • Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology
4
Replies
112
Views
19K
High School Deep Impact: NASA's Mission to Smash a Comet on the Fourth of July
  • Orion1
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
4K
High School Mechanics behind curved time causing gravitation/geodesics
  • tachi158
  • · Replies 27 ·
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
8K
A Beagle In The Pound and a MARSIS Wing-Clipped
  • Nommos Prime (Dogon)
  • · Replies 4 ·
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
6K