Rotation Operator Matrix Representation using |+z> and |-z> Basis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the matrix representation of the rotation operator R(φk) using the |+z> and |-z> basis. Participants explore how to express the operation R|ψ> in matrix form, with |ψ> defined as a linear combination of the basis states. The relationship between the rotation operator and the Pauli spin matrices is confirmed, emphasizing that the spin operators are generators of rotations. A participant successfully verifies that R†R equals one using the matrix provided in the z basis. Clarification is sought on changing bases and deriving the transformation matrix S, which is linked to linear algebra concepts.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Determine the matrix representation of the rotation operator
R(\phi k) using the states |+z> and |-z> as a basis. Using your matrix representation verify that R^{\dagger}R=1

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I need to write R| \psi> in terms of a matrix.
If I have |\psi>=a|+z>+b|-z>
Then do I just operate R on \psi and then write this in terms of a matrix.
are these related to the Pauli spin matrices
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:

Homework Statement


Determine the matrix representation of the rotation operator
R(\phi k) using the states |+z> and |-z> as a basis. Using your matrix representation verify that R^{\dagger}R=1

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I need to write R| \psi> in terms of a matrix.
If I have |\psi>=a|+z>+b|-z>
Then do I just operate R on \psi and then write this in terms of a matrix.
I'm not sure exactly what you had in mind, but it's probably not the most straightforward way to solve this problem.
are these related to the Pauli spin matrices
Yes. Remember that the spin operators ##\hat{S}_x##, ##\hat{S}_y##, and ##\hat{S}_z## are generators of rotations. (This is definitely covered in your textbook.) Use that fact to calculate R.
 
ok thanks for your help. My book gives the matrix for R and it is in the z basis.
And I took R^{\dagger}R and it equaled one. But If the matrix wasn't in the
z basis would I use the roatation matrix to get the answer.
I would take S^{\dagger}RS and this would give the correct R for the problem.
 
I don't understand what you're asking. Well, I sort of do, but I'd like you to clarify your question. What is S? How did you find S?
 
s= \[left (begin{array}{cc}<+z|+x>& <+z|-x>\\ <-z|+x>& <-z|-x> \end{array}\right)\]
where the bras are what basis I am going to and the kets are the basis that I was in. I don't really know how S is derived though
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's the regular method you use to change bases. You're doing the same thing you learned in linear algebra. It's just the notation that's different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K