Rotation Operator: Interaction between Two-Level Atom in {|g>, |e>} Basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter zDrajCa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Rotation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction of a two-level atom represented in the {|g>, |e>} basis, specifically focusing on the application of the rotation operator defined as R(t)=exp[i(σz+1)ωt/2]. Participants are exploring the representation of this operator and the implications of matrix exponentiation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to represent the rotation operator in the {|g>, |e>} basis and are discussing the implications of taking the exponential of a matrix, particularly in relation to diagonal matrices. Questions are raised about the consistency of the exponential values across different positions in the matrix.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their understanding of matrix exponentiation and its application to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of diagonal matrices and their exponentials, but no consensus has been reached on the specific representation of the rotation operator.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the identity matrix in the context of the rotation operator, and participants are considering the implications of this in their calculations. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on the mathematical properties involved.

zDrajCa
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template when starting threads in the schoolwork forums
Hi, I'm working on the interaction between a two level atom (|g>, |e>)
In my exercise we have to use the rotation operator :

R(t)=exp[i(σz+1)ωt/2]

with σz the pauli matrix which is in the {|g>,|e>} basis :
(1 0)
(0 -1)

If i want to represent my rotation operator in the {|g>,|e>} basis. Then i can do:
σz +1 = (1 is the identity matrix)
( 2 0)
( 0 0)

Do my operator is :
(exp(iwt) 0 )
( 0 exp(0) )

Thanks for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with taking exponential of a matrix. But if you had exp(0) in the lower right position, would it also be exp(0) in the upper right and lower left?
 
i have read that if a matrix was diagonal (my case right) ,then the exponential of the matrix is the exponential of his diagonal term
 
scottdave said:
I'm not familiar with taking exponential of a matrix. But if you had exp(0) in the lower right position, would it also be exp(0) in the upper right and lower left?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_exponential
It can be expanded in a Taylor series.
zDrajCa said:
the exponential of the matrix is the exponential of his diagonal term
Yes, this is right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K