Rotation w/constant angular acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a flywheel that decelerates from an angular speed of 1.5 rad/s to a stop while completing 40 revolutions. The calculated time to come to rest is approximately 340 seconds, with an angular acceleration of -0.0048 rad/s². For the first 20 revolutions, the time calculated using the kinematic equation is 99.67 seconds, which is close to the textbook answer of 98 seconds. The discrepancy is attributed to premature rounding during calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular kinematics
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula
  • Knowledge of constant angular acceleration concepts
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (revolutions to radians)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review angular kinematics equations in detail
  • Practice solving problems involving constant angular acceleration
  • Learn about the impact of rounding errors in calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering concepts of rotational motion and angular acceleration calculations.

Ignitia

Homework Statement


A flywheel turns through 40 rev as it slows from an angular speed of 1.5 rad/s to a stop. (a) Assuming a constant angular acceleration, find the time for it to come to rest. (b) What is its angular acceleration? (c) How much time is required for it to complete the first 20 of the 40 revolutions?

Homework Equations


Figured (a) and (b) no problem. (a) =335s (round to 340s) and (b) = -0.0048rad/s2

40revs = 80π
20revs = 40π

The Attempt at a Solution


For (c) I went:

θf - θi = wit+1/2αt2
40π = 1.5t - 0.0024t2
0=-0.0024t2 + 1.5t + 40π

Plug them into the quadratic formula: t = (-1.5) - √(1.5 2 - 4(-.0024*-40π)) / (2(-.0024))

Calculator spits out t = 99.67s. The book says it's 98. It's close enough I want to write it off as correct, but I'd prefer if it could be double checked.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignitia said:
Calculator spits out t = 99.67s. The book says it's 98.
98 is nearer.
I expect your error comes from rounding off too soon. Always keep more digits than you intend to quote in the final answer. How many more is not always obvious. E.g. if you have a step that is equivalent to 100002-100001 then you need to keep 6 digits along the way to have just one digit at the end.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ignitia
I figured that might have been the reason, thanks. I just wanted to be sure my method was correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K