Rotational Dynamics Designing a Propeller Velocity/Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in rotational dynamics, specifically focusing on the design of an airplane propeller. The original poster is tasked with determining the maximum radius of the propeller and the acceleration of its tip, given specific constraints on rotational speed and tip velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the relationship between linear and angular velocity but encounters confusion regarding the treatment of the propeller's tip velocity in relation to the airplane's forward speed. Some participants question the need to consider both the tangential and forward velocity components when calculating the maximum radius.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering clarifications about the components of velocity involved. There is a productive exchange regarding the interpretation of the problem's wording and the implications for calculations, though no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

The problem specifies a maximum velocity for the propeller tips through the air, which introduces complexity in how the velocities are combined. Participants are exploring the implications of this requirement and how it affects their calculations.

hitspace
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are asked to design an airplane propleller to turn at 2400 rpm. The forward airspeed of the plane is to be 75.0 m/s, and the speed of the tips of the propeller blades through the air must not exceed 270 m/s. What is the maximum radius the propeller can have? With this radius, what is the acceleration of the propeller tip?

Homework Equations


v = rw
alpha = omega^2 (r)

The Attempt at a Solution



My issue with this problem is after trying to understand the explained solution. This problem is an example in my physics book.

Both the book and I convert the 2400 rpm into rad/s

(2400(2)pi)/60 = 251 rad/s

This is where I get confused. I simply divide as so, v= rw , so v/w = r

270/251 = 1.07 m

The book doesn't do this, instead it says V_tip^2 = V_plane^2 + V_tan^2 = V_plane^2 + (r^2)(w^2)
They then solve for r and get r = 1.03 vs what I got, 1.07.

What exactly are they accounting for is I think what I am trying to understand. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are forgetting the velocity component in the forward direction (which is orthogonal to the tangential, hence Pythagoras).

Edit: To expand on that, the problem states that the tips have a max velocity through the air - not relative to the centre of the propeller. The entire propeller moves relative to the air.
 
Thanks for the assistance. I'm still a bit confused. Are you saying that since the problem defined the 270 m/s velocity limit through the air as both components of velocity , tangential and otherwise, I need to account for both components?

I have this inkling that it might help if you would kindly speculate on the wording the book would use if I didn't need to account for the forward velocity of the plane. As I read it now, I was under the impression that I should disregard it.

Thank you again, and I do apologize if I'm wearing on your patience.
 
hitspace said:
Are you saying that since the problem defined the 270 m/s velocity limit through the air as both components of velocity , tangential and otherwise
Not sure what you mean by that. It defines 270 m/s as the maximum speed of the tip relative to the air. Speed is the magnitude of the overall velocity. You have two components, tangential and forward, at right angles to each other, so to find the magnitude of the overall velocity vector you can use Pythagoras.
 
hitspace said:
I have this inkling that it might help if you would kindly speculate on the wording the book would use if I didn't need to account for the forward velocity of the plane. As I read it now, I was under the impression that I should disregard it

It would say something like "tangential speed" or "rotational speed". As posed, it is rather clear that it means overall speed.
 
Thanks for the insight. I appreciate you taking the time to help me out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
978
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K