Rotational Dynamics Problem - Rod slipping against Block

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
35 replies · 8K views
Tanya Sharma
Messages
1,541
Reaction score
135

Homework Statement



A uniform rod of mass m and length l is pivoted at point O. The rod is initially in vertical position and touching a block of mass M which is at rest on a horizontal surface. The rod is given a slight jerk and it starts rotating about point O. This causes the block to move forward. The rod loses contact with the block at θ = 30°. All surfaces are smooth.

1. The value of M/m?
2. The velocity of block when the rod loses contact with the block?
3. The acceleration of center of mass of rod, when it loses contact with the block?
4. The hinge reaction at O on the rod when it loses contact with the block?


Ans 1) 4:3
2)√(3gl)/4
3) (3g)/4
4)(mg/4)j




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The speed of the tip of the rod in horizontal direction is same as that of the block .

Let V be the speed of the block when rod loses contact with block.
So,Horizontal speed of the tip of the rod = V
Component of speed perpendicular to length of the rod =[itex]V_{\bot}[/itex] = VSin30°=V/2
Angular speed of the rod at the instant block leaves contact with the rod =[itex]\frac{V_{\bot}}{l}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{V}{2l}[/itex]

Applying Conservation of Energy ,

Loss in Potential Energy of Rod = Gain in Rotational Kinetic Energy of Rod + Gain in KE of Block

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{2}(1-Sin60°) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{ml^2}{3}(ω ^2) +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{2}(1-Sin60°) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{ml^2}{3}\frac{V ^2}{4l^2} +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{4} = \frac{mV^2}{24} +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

Is my approach correct ? Now ,how am I supposed to proceed further ? one more equation is required to solve the problem ...
 

Attachments

  • rod-block.jpg
    rod-block.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 720
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanya Sharma said:
So,Horizontal speed of the tip of the rod = V
Component of speed perpendicular to length of the rod =[itex]V_{\bot}[/itex] = VSin30°=V/2
No, that's backwards. Which way is the tip of the rod moving?
[itex]\frac{Mgl}{2}(1-Sin60°) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{ml^2}{3}(ω ^2) +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]
Not sin(60), I think. But I see that you actually used the right value below.
how am I supposed to proceed further ?
Maybe energy alone won't cut it, and you need to use forces and accelerations. This could be because the energy equation fails to capture the fact that the tip of the rod and the block have moved the same horizontal distance in the same time.
 
Thank you very much for the reply...I understand my mistake...

The component of angular speed of the tip of the rod in horizontal direction is same as that of the block .

Let V be the speed of the block when rod loses contact with block.
So,Horizontal component of angular speed of the tip of the rod = ωlcos60°=V

So,ωl/2=V
Thus,ω = 2V/l

Applying Conservation of Energy ,

Loss in Potential Energy of Rod = Gain in Rotational Kinetic Energy of Rod + Gain in KE of Block

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{2}(1-Sin60°) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{ml^2}{3}(ω ^2) +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{2}(1-Sin60°) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{ml^2}{3}\frac{4V ^2}{l^2} +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Mgl}{4} = \frac{2mV^2}{3} +\frac{1}{2}MV^2[/itex]

Maybe energy alone won't cut it, and you need to use forces and accelerations. This could be because the energy equation fails to capture the fact that the tip of the rod and the block have moved the same horizontal distance in the same time.

I have thought in terms of forces...but really haven't been able to relate things...

The forces on the rod are

Hinge force in x direction = Hx
Hinge force in y direction = Hy
Force due to gravity = mg
Normal contact force from the block = N

The force on the block are

Normal contact force from the rod = N

I know how to calculate acceleration and torques but i am unable to relate them so that given condition in the question is satisfied.

Please can you explain ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
I have thought in terms of forces...but really haven't been able to relate things...
Don't worry about the force at the hinge. The critical statement we have to turn into an equation is that the normal force vanishes. In terms of the angular speed and acceleration, what is the acceleration of the block (be very careful with that one), the normal force on the block, and the torque on the rod?
 
Net torque on the rod about pivot =[itex]mg\frac{l}{2}cosθ -Nlsinθ[/itex]
where θ is the angle which rod makes with the horizontal

The acceleration of the block is a=N/M where N is the normal contact force between block and the rod

Since ,ωl/2=V

Therefore , differentiating above we get,
αl/2=a
 
Last edited:
Oh...sorry I have edited my earlier post...

The acceleration of the block is a=N/M where N is the normal contact force between block and the rod

Since ,ωl/2=V

Therefore , differentiating above we get,
αl/2=a
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Oh...sorry I have edited my earlier post...

The acceleration of the block is a=N/M where N is the normal contact force between block and the rod

Since ,ωl/2=V

Therefore , differentiating above we get,
αl/2=a
No, please work with the forces. Your method above merely expresses the assumption that the two stay in contact. To find when they, in fact, would not we need to look at forces. (You will need the polar coordinate formula for acceleration of the tip.)
 
I don't know how to work with polar coordinates...I would be grateful if you could tell me the polar coordinate formula for acceleration of the tip.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
I don't know how to work with polar coordinates...I would be grateful if you could tell me the polar coordinate formula for acceleration of the tip.
I expect you do, but maybe not with that terminology. If the rod were rotating at constant angular speed it would nonetheless have an acceleration, right? What's the formula for that and in which direction does it operate? Since the angular speed is not constant it has another linear acceleration. What's the formula and direction of that?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
I don't know how to work with polar coordinates...I would be grateful if you could tell me the polar coordinate formula for acceleration of the tip.

You know that the coordinates of the tip of rod are y=Lsin(θ) and x=Lcos(θ)
You can find the components of acceleration in terms of derivatives of θ. The tip of the rod is at the same x coordinate as the left side of the block, so the second derivative of x is the acceleration of the block. What force acts on the block? What is the force when the rod loses contact with the block?

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild...Thank you

ehild said:
You know that the coordinates of the tip of rod are y=Lsin(θ) and x=Lcos(θ)
You can find the components of acceleration in terms of derivatives of θ. The tip of the rod is at the same x coordinate as the left side of the block, so the second derivative of x is the acceleration of the block.
ehild

[itex]\frac {d^2x} {dt^2} = -Lcosθ[/itex]

What does -ve sign signify??

ehild said:
What force acts on the block?

Force on the block = N
Thus, N=-MLcosθ . I am not sure about the -ve sign.

ehild said:
What is the force when the rod loses contact with the block?

There is no force horizontally on the block when it loses contact with the rod i.e N=0
 
Do we have to take θ = ω0t + (1/2)αt2 where ω0 =0 ?
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Do we have to take θ = ω0t + (1/2)αt2 where ω0 =0 ?

NO, why do you think that the angular acceleration is constant? θ is a function of t, ω is its first derivative and α is the second derivative with respect to t.

ehild
 
x=Lcos(θ)

dx/dt = -ωLsin(θ)

d2x/dt2= -L(ωcosθ + αsinθ)
 
You know product rule and chain rule of differentiation? x is function of θ but θ is function of t. The velocity is function of θ and ω, both depend on t.
ωsin(θ) is a product of two functions.
Apart from Physics, how do you calculate the first and second derivative of a function f(g(t))?

ehild.
 
ehild said:
You know product rule and chain rule of differentiation? x is function of θ but θ is function of t. The velocity is function of θ and ω, both depend on t.
ωsin(θ) is a product of two functions.
Apart from Physics, how do you calculate the first and second derivative of a function f(g(t))?

ehild.

x=Lcos(θ)

dx/dt = -Lsin(θ)(dθ/dt)

d2x/dt2= -L [cosθ(dθ/dt) + sinθ(d2θ/dt) ]
 
Not quite... d2x/dt2= -L [cosθ(dθ/dt)2 + sinθ(d2θ/dt2) ]= -L(cosθ ω2+sinθ α).

What force acts on the block?

What is the acceleration of the block when it loses contact with the rod?

How are ω and α related at that moment?

ehild
 
ehild said:
d2x/dt2= -L [cosθ(dθ/dt)2 + sinθ(d2θ/dt2) ]

The first term in the bracket on the right side should be cosθ(dθ/dt) .Here we keep dθ/dt constant and differentiate sinθ .
 
Tanya Sharma said:
The first term in the bracket on the right side should be cosθ(dθ/dt) .Here we keep dθ/dt constant and differentiate sinθ .

You have to differentiate sinθ(t). d(sinθ(t))/dt=cosθ(dθ/dt). And it was multiplied with dθ/dt. So the first term is cosθ (dθ/dt)2.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ehild...You are right :blushing:

So now we have acceleration of the tip of the rod as

d2x/dt2= -L [cosθ(dθ/dt)2 + sinθ(d2θ/dt2) ]= -L(cosθ ω2+sinθ α).

Force acting on the block = N

Accelaration of the block =N/M

So, N/M = -L(cosθ ω2+sinθ α).

Is that so??
 
N=0 at this moment.Putting N=0 ,we get

ω2 =-αtanθ

now Iα = mg(l/2)cosθ at the moment rod loses contact .

I get correct values for first three parts .:biggrin:

Now, how to deal with last part where we have to calculate hinge force ??
 
You work very fast.:smile:
The force at the hinge can be determined if you know the acceleration of the centre of mass, which is the sum of all forces divided by m.

What is the acceleration of the COM at angle θ =30°?

ehild
 
acom=3g/4.I have calculated it from the radial and tangential components.

Is there another way of calculating it??
 
Last edited:
How are both the x and y components half of the acceleration of the tip of the rod?? I mean , I don't understand how the accelerations of COM and the tip are related ??
 
Okay...i understand what you say...

Why is there a -ve sign in the expression for N and ω2 ? I mean what does the -ve sign signify considering ω2 is a positive quantity.
 
Last edited: