Rotational Dynamics Problem - Rod slipping against Block

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
35 replies · 8K views
The normal force on the block is positive or zero. ω2 is positive, but the angular acceleration can be negative.

Have you got the direction of the acceleration of the COM?

ehild
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehild said:
Have you got the direction of the acceleration of the COM?

ehild

Yes , I have got the direction of acceleration of COM.I worked with radial and tangential components and found their resultant i.e acom to make 30° with the tangential component .i.e vertically downwards .This showed that the net acceleration of COM was vertically downwards at the moment rod loses contact with the block .The net resultant force should be vertically downwards i.e -ve y-axis .Now N vanishes so horizontal component of Hinge force is zero . :smile:
 
Very well! So you got the correct result that the reaction force is mg/4 at the hinge upward.

You would get the same from the x,y components of acceleration. I like this method, as I usually get confused with the radial and tangential components.
The coordinates of the COM of a homogeneous rod with the ends at (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) are Xcom=(x1+x2)/2, Ycom=(y1+y2)/2. (x1,y1)=(0,0), and (x2,y2)=(x,y) here, so Xcom=x/2, Ycom=y/2.

You derived the x component of acceleration already, the same has to be done with the y component.

y=Lsin(θ) y'=Lcos(θ) θ',

y''= L(-sin(θ)θ'2+cos(θ)θ")=L(-sinθω2+cos(θ)ω')

When loosing contact, y"=L(-1/2 ω2+√3/2 ω')

From the condition that the x component of acceleration is zero, you have got that

ω'=-√3 ω2 and ω2=3g/4L, therefore y"=-3g/2,

and Ycom"=-3g/4.

ehild
 
ehild...Thank you very much ...

Its a fantastic experience learning from you .You taught me Physics ,Calculus,Polar Coordinates all in one question :biggrin:
 
Tanya Sharma said:
ehild...Thank you very much ...

Its a fantastic experience learning from you .You taught me Physics ,Calculus,Polar Coordinates all in one question :biggrin:

So you discovered that it was about relation between polar and Cartesian coordinates? I did not want to confuse you by speaking about polar coordinates: :-p

ehild
 
yes process is correct
 
Last edited: