Rotational Equilibrium uniform boom problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a uniform boom in rotational equilibrium, supported by a cable and subjected to a weight at its top. The participants are tasked with determining the force exerted by the cable and the components of the reaction force at the pivot point, using principles of torque and force equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torques and forces, questioning the direction of gravitational forces and their components relative to the boom. There is a focus on the angles used in calculations and how they relate to the axes chosen for analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining different interpretations of angles and force components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the standard practice of measuring angles with respect to the horizontal axis, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the conventions for measuring angles and the representation of force components, which may affect the clarity of the solutions presented. Participants are encouraged to clarify their axes and ensure their work aligns with the expectations of any grading criteria.

JinM
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(Figure is attached)
A 1200.0 N uniform boom is supported by a cable,as
shown in Figure 8-22.The boom is pivoted at the bot-
tom,and a 2000.0 N weight hangs from its top.Find the
force applied by the supporting cable and the compo-
nents ofthe reaction force on the bottom ofthe boom.
(See Sample Problem 8B.)

Legend:
t denotes torque
T denotes tension
d denotes distance from pivot
Fg denotes gravitational force
Rx denotes horizontal component of reaction force
Ry denotes vertical component of reaction force.

Homework Equations


tnet = Fd sin theta
Fnet =ma


The Attempt at a Solution



Take point A as pivot
tnet = 0
tnet = tT + tFg1 + tFg2 = 0

+(T x 0.75L sin 90) - (Fg1 x 0.5L sin 25) - (Fg2 x L sin 25) = 0

T = 1464 N

Fnet = T + Fg1 + Fg2 + Rx + Ry = 0

Fx = Fg1 cos 205 + Fg2 cos 205 + Rx = 0
Rx = 2912 N

Fg = Ry + Fg1 sin 205 + Fg2 sin 205 + T sin 90 = 0
Ry = - 111

R = Sqrt(-111^2 + 2912^2)
R = 2915.7 N

My angles for T, Fg1, and Fg2 are 90, 205, and 205, respectively. I got this wrong, and I'm curious why.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 2.png
    Picture 2.png
    3 KB · Views: 618
Physics news on Phys.org
The weights act vertically.

How are you using x and y?
 
I took the forces perpendicular to the inclined boom, for torques ask for the forces to be perpendicular to the lever arm. I don't see why weights should act vertically, though. Shouldn't it be perpendicular to the boom, as I've done above?
 
Which way does gravity act?
 
downwards, but doesn't it have a component that is perpendicular to the boom?
 
Sure.
 
So in a sense, I am correct in taking the angles as they are above? I only ask this because my teacher took tension T at 155 degrees and F_g at 270 degrees, which doesn't make sense to me!
 
Your teacher is measuring angles with respect to the x-axis (horizontal), which is standard practice.
 
We got different solutions though -- I wish it was just a matter of convention.
 
  • #10
JinM said:
We got different solutions though -- I wish it was just a matter of convention.
When I get a few minutes, I'll look through your work. But since you use different x and y axes, could that be the problem? Aren't you supposed to give horizontal and vertical components?
 
  • #11
I think that is what I'd already done? Maybe it's a little messy up there -- it could definitely be redone more efficiently. For one thing, since tension is perpendicular, it's just simply positioned at 90 degrees to the boom. F_g would be in the opposite direction at 25 degrees, so the component would be F_g*sin(25). See, my reference is the boom -- that's where my horizontal is, and that is why, I think, our solutions differ.

I'd appreciate it if you could look through my work!
 
  • #12
OK, I looked it over. Your work and angles look OK, given your choice of axis. (Except for some slight arithmetic differences.) Of course, if you don't translate your reaction force components into the form asked for (horizontal and vertical), then of course you will have different answers.

(If someone's grading your work, you must make it easy for them to figure out what you're doing. You should state up front that your x and y-axis are not horizontal and vertical, but parallel and perpendicular. But still, it's up to you to answer the question as asked.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
19K
Replies
4
Views
5K